New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | 2% | 16% | 40% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
2 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
3 | LUNG Katerina | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 60% | |
3 | MCGILLION-MOORE Katie | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 20% | |
5 | HUANG Natalie | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | < 1% |
6 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 45% | |
7 | HO Brianna W. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
8 | CHEN Jia P. | - | 2% | 14% | 45% | 33% | 7% | |
9 | XU Christine | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
10 | SHEN Lydia | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
11 | HE Fenghuan | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 30% | 63% |
12 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 3% | 29% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - | |
13 | LI Meilin | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 39% | 32% | 4% |
14 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 3% | 18% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - |
15 | YU Jaime L. | - | 2% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
16 | DU Hannah | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
17 | CHEN Allison V. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% |
18 | XU Madison | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
19 | XUE Alanna | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
20 | LEE Montana | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
21 | LI Rachel Y. | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
22 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
23 | RASO Olivia | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | - |
24 | FU Qihan | 9% | 35% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | |
25 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 6% | 33% | 41% | 18% | 2% | - | |
26 | WANG Yudi | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
27 | HUNT Abigail S. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
28 | ROY Layla | 30% | 48% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
29 | KULKARNI Sohah A. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
30 | SU Michelle | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
31 | WANG Chloe | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
32 | MI Anning | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
33 | CHARALEL Jessica | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% | |
34 | GAO Anna | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
35 | YU Nicole J. | 1% | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | |
37 | MUELLER Tatum J. | 5% | 24% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
38 | CHEN Jasmine | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | - |
39 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 4% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
40 | SUNG Yoomin | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
41 | DICANIO Gianna | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - | |
42 | KOGAN Stella | 11% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
43 | BAO Andria | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
44 | KOGAN Alexis | 13% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 1% | - | |
45 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
46 | PARK Caitlyn | 7% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.