Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FORTUNE Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 16% |
| 2 | LYUTIKOV Yegor | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
| 3 | ZHAO Jason L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | |
| 3 | ZHAO Sophie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
| 5 | WANG Eric J | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
| 6 | CHO Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 7 | BRIEN Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% | |
| 8 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 23% | 2% | |
| 9 | BLAKEMAN Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 62% | 20% |
| 10 | SMITH Erick | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 11 | BOLARIN Oluwatosin N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 11 | PALWAI Suhas | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 14 | FISHER Austin | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 15 | CLAYPOOL Conner | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% | |
| 16 | MILLER Daniel | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 17 | DENMAN Kirsten S. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% | |
| 18 | SMITH Cooper | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 19 | LEE Claire | 100% | 76% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
| 20 | POPOLOW Alexander | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 34% | 4% | |
| 21 | DENMAN Matthew L | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | ZHAO Zhiyong | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 23 | PINKERTON Joseph (Joe) | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 24 | MARTIN Maximilian | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 25 | BLACKLEDGE Michael | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 26 | PRIJATEL John R. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 27 | GOSMEYER Matthew | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 27 | MOROZE Daniel | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 29 | FISHER Racheal | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 30 | DENIHAN John | 100% | 80% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | DEMOSS Mercedes | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
| 31 | SOARE Maria Elena | 100% | 88% | 56% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 33 | PETRIKIN Annika | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
| 34 | BERNWANGER Phillip | 100% | 88% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.