Minneapolis, MN, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | KOTOV Leonid | V V V V V D | V V V V V V | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
2 | WU Roger (Mengke) | V V V D V | V V V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
3 | HOUTZ Jackson | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
3 | LIU kelly | V V V D D V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
5 | GREENBAUM Maxwell H. | V V V D V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
6 | BERGER Oliver | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
7 | YANG Ziyi | V V D D V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
8 | ESCUETA Tony V. | D V D V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
9 | MICHELL Bailey | V V D V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
10 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | V D V V D V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
11 | SHAHZAD Azlan A. | V D V D V | V V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
12 | CHEONG Heonjae | V D V V D | V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
13 | YEN Preston | V V D V D | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
14 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | V V D V D D | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
15 | MARGULIES William | D D D V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
16 | PAN Alex | D D V D V | V V V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
17 | REYES Xavier M. | V V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
18 | WOODWARD Dylan P. | V D V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
19 | WANG Eric Y. | V V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
20 | HONG Vincent Q. | D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
21 | LINDHOLM Oliver S. | V V V V D | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
22 | LUO George F. | V V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
22 | NOBLE Colin | V V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
24 | PIWOWAR Alex | D V D V V V | V D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
25 | WOODWARD Connor | D V D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
25 | VOCHOSKA Aidan F. | V V D V D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
27 | GUAN Luke | V D D V V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
28 | RIGHTLER Samuel | V D D V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
29 | FENG Leo | D D V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
30 | KROON Lucas | D V D D V | V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
31 | CHOI Silas | D D V V D | V V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
32 | PANDEY Neil | D V D D V D | V V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
33 | WONG Ryan | V V V V V | D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
34 | XU Andrew | D V V V V V | D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
35 | SCHERER Max | V V V V V D | D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
36 | CHANG Colin S. | V V D V V V | D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
37 | YUN Jake | V V V V D | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
38 | HONG Steven | V V V V D | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
39 | COLE Alexander | D V V V V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
40 | FLOT Tai A. | D V V V D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
41 | EDELMAN Seth A. | V D V D V V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
42 | POPE Nico | V V D V D | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
43 | MICLAUS Justin | D D V V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
44 | FALLICK Ozzie | V V D D V | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
45 | PI Alexander | D V D V V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
45 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | V D V D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
47 | CAISSE Simon B. | V D V V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
48 | SHOMAN Noah | V D V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
48 | LEITH Jack | D D V V V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
50 | SHOMAN Zachary | V D D V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
51 | EICHHORN Lukas H. | D V D V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
52 | BAUER Hank E. | V V D D D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
53 | MURZYN III CJ | V V V D D D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
54 | PRIMUS Nazir | V D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
55 | ZHOU Miles | V D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
56 | CHEN Evan P. | D D V V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
57 | MEDVEDEV Michail D. | D V V D D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
58 | DOLAN Charles R. | V D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
59 | FREYRE DE ANDRADE Elian R. | D V D D V D | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
60 | DENG Andrew | D D D V V D | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
61 | LOPEZ Lucas M. | D V D D D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
61 | SINGH Angadh | D V V D D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
63 | CORTEZ Christopher | D D D V D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
64 | PATIL Aaryan A. | D D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
65 | COVINGTON Max G. | D D V V D V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
66 | KIM Alexander M. | D V V V D D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
67 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | D V D V V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
68 | MORALES Jonathan | V D V D D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
69 | RHEE Ethan N. | D D V D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
70 | ZHU Charlie | D V D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
71 | GLOZMAN Justin | D V V D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
72 | HONG Rubin | V V D D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
73 | CHAVES Matthew J. | D V D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
74 | BULL Anderson | D D V D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
75 | BEITEL Noah | D V D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
76 | DELARUE NELSON Y. | V D V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
77 | HOLMES Aiden G. | D V D D V D | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
78 | CHEONG Heonjun | D D D V V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
79 | SCHARDINE James | V V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
80 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | D D V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
81 | SHANKAR Karthik | D V D D D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 | |
82 | HAN Daniel Y. | V D D D D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 | |
83 | GOLDIN Lucca | D D D V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 | |
83 | KIM Matthew | D V D D D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 | |
85 | CHAN Aidan | V D D D D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 | |
86 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | D D D D V | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 | |
87 | SOUTHWORTH Nathaniel | D D D V D D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 | |
88 | LIN Nick | D D V D D D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 | |
89 | FIELDS Matthew S. | D D V D D D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 | |
90 | HUANG Zekai | D D D D D V | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 | |
91 | REN Richard | D D D D D D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 | |
92 | SHANAHAN Adam E. | D D D D D | 3.0 | 0 | -3.0 | |
93 | GRATHWOL-SEAR Oliver | D D D D D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 | |
94 | SHETTY VIVAN | D D D D D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 | |
95 | AN Damon | D D D D D D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 | |
96 | WILKINSON James | D D D D D D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.