New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZAFFT Tatiana M. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 44% | 34% | 7% |
| 2 | SMUK Daria A. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% | |
| 3 | REID Sobia | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 5% | |
| 3 | SAAL Anna | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 5% | |
| 5 | PALANSKI Cate | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 6 | SMITH Grace L. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 44% | 22% | |
| 7 | LI Alisha | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 8 | REID Anousheh | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 9 | CHERNYSHOVA Victoria | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
| 10 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% | |
| 11 | PARTE Isabella B. | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% | |
| 12 | LUO Ashley | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 5% | |
| 13 | YU Nicole J. | 6% | 31% | 43% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 14 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Maia | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 15 | PAN Michelle | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 16 | MUELLER Emma M. | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 17 | NAYAK Mira | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% | |
| 18 | PAYNE Elizabeth | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 19 | JIANG Caroline T. | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 20 | LEE Anna | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 21 | SCHMULTS Sophie W. | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 21 | CHANG Ella | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 23 | ZHENG Linden | 20% | 43% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | JOSEPH Mikayla | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | BEEM Marin | 18% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.