Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | STREB Joseph S. | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 47% | 34% |
2 | BAKER Keith L. | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 40% | 13% | 1% |
3 | SMITH Ted | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 46% | 26% |
3 | SEUSS C. David | - | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 60% |
5 | REILLY Philip V. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 38% | 8% |
6 | KATH Philip (Doc) D. | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
7 | LIBERS Alexander M. | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 40% | 16% | 1% |
8 | BIANCHINI Victor (Vic) E. | - | - | 6% | 34% | 42% | 15% | 2% |
9 | HOLLINGSWORTH Frank J. | 8% | 36% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
10 | DI GENNARO John | 1% | 9% | 40% | 37% | 12% | 1% | - |
11 | DUNLOP Richard (Dick) M. | 31% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
12 | SEGALE William J. | 10% | 44% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
13 | REA John P. | 46% | 46% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
13 | GRAVIS Martin V. | 55% | 37% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.