Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZAFFT Sharrie A. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
2 | GANSER Yuliya | - | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% |
3 | TOLLEY Toby | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 41% | 13% | |
3 | TOTEMEIER Ann M. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% |
5 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
6 | EXUM Monica M. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 39% | 52% | |
7 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 36% | 35% | 9% |
8 | PAINE Cheryl A. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
9 | ROWLAND May | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
10 | WOLF Lisa A. | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 19% | 2% | |
11 | CAREY Michele S. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
12 | GIFFORD Sally | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
13 | FELSENHELD Donna B. | 7% | 37% | 39% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
14 | BYRON Karen J. | 9% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | |
15 | BRISK Angelica A. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
16 | DREYER Nadia S. | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
17 | SCHMID Carola K. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% |
18 | LORENTSON Dawn M. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
19 | INAMDAR Nina S. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
20 | GERRISH Joanne | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
21 | GROCE Linda J. | 61% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
22 | KELLY Diane A. | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
23 | DICKEY Jacquelyn | 30% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
24 | WOUNDY Melissa A. | 2% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
25 | PIERCE Marcia M. | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
26 | VACCARO Jennifer | 5% | 29% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
27 | FRANZ Lisa L. | 17% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.