Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MACHULSKY Leehi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 
| 2 | GU Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | 
| 3 | JAKEL Sophia N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% | 
| 3 | FALLON Kyle R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | 
| 5 | XIAO Ruien | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% | 
| 6 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 
| 7 | REID Anousheh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 22% | 
| 8 | YIN Julia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% | 
| 9 | NGUYEN Kira | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% | 
| 10 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% | 
| 11 | LUO Ashley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 
| 12 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% | |
| 13 | XUAN Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% | 
| 14 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% | 
| 15 | PADHYE Tanishka | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 24% | 
| 16 | SWENSON Nikita G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 27% | 3% | 
| 17 | KORFONTA Jolie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% | 
| 18 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% | 
| 19 | QI Jarynne Valerie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% | 
| 20 | BARG Daniella | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% | 
| 21 | ELSTON Sophia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 5% | 
| 22 | MEHROTRA Anya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% | 
| 23 | SPRINGER Sierra | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 3% | 
| 24 | PEHLIVANI Zara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 15% | 
| 25 | HONG Elaine | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 2% | 
| 26 | AI Amy | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 13% | 2% | 
| 27 | BUSH Emma | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% | 
| 28 | REMEZA Alissa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 6% | 
| 29 | RUNIONS Emersyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% | 
| 30 | LEE Natasha | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 3% | 
| 31 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% | 
| 32 | RAKHOVSKI Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 9% | 
| 33 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | 
| 34 | SHIV Avni | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% | 
| 35 | YAO Melinda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 17% | 
| 36 | YU Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 14% | 
| 37 | WANG Ziqi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% | 2% | 
| 38 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% | 
| 39 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 6% | 
| 40 | HESS Heidi J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 3% | 
| 40 | SHU Youshan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% | 
| 42 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% | 
| 43 | BECKMAN Ana | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% | 
| 44 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 48% | 
| 45 | ALEXANDROV Katherine S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 42% | 10% | 
| 46 | MALLAVARPU saanvi | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - | 
| 47 | CALDERA Lexi I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 19% | 
| 48 | BENZAN India | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - | 
| 48 | KORKIN Alice | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 1% | 
| 50 | LEE yat ching | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 26% | 4% | 
| 51 | LEE Yedda | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 22% | 1% | 
| 52 | GUJJA Misha | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 21% | 3% | 
| 53 | CHA Eugenie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | 
| 54 | SU Evelyn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 21% | 1% | 
| 55 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% | 
| 56 | YAO Yilin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% | 
| 57 | SONG Angela | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% | 
| 58 | BEAVER Ava | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 21% | 3% | 
| 59 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 4% | 
| 60 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% | 1% | 
| 61 | JAKEL Alysa C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% | - | 
| 62 | CARRIER Meredith | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - | 
| 63 | BARBARA Camille | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | 
| 64 | HUANG Lanlan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - | 
| 65 | CAFASSO Natalya | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | 
| 66 | ZHANG Victoria R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% | 
| 67 | FURMAN Maria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 33% | 4% | 
| 68 | POTAPENKO Margarita D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 46% | 12% | 
| 69 | KUMAR Eva | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | - | 
| 70 | HSIU Elizabeth | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 14% | 2% | |
| 71 | LI Zhenni (Jenny) | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - | 
| 72 | ANDERSON Claire | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 13% | 1% | 
| 72 | YANG Alisa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 14% | 
| 74 | ZHU Serene M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 2% | 
| 74 | MUELLER Emma M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 5% | 
| 76 | YOU Emily | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 2% | 
| 77 | PEELER Julia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% | 
| 78 | NAIR Supriya | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% | - | 
| 79 | TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 30% | 6% | 
| 80 | MUN Brianna K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% | 
| 81 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% | 
| 82 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | 
| 83 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 100% | 98% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - | 
| 84 | CHANG Celine A. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | 
| 85 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% | 
| 86 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 32% | 7% | 
| 87 | SHARMA Sanvi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 25% | 2% | 
| 88 | XIONG Angelica | 100% | 98% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | 
| 89 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% | 
| 90 | PHUKAN Indra | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 5% | - | 
| 91 | KUKVA Taisiya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 2% | 
| 92 | HAFEEZ Hania | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | 
| 93 | WONG Alexandra R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 6% | 
| 94 | LI Suri | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - | 
| 95 | LI Fei | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | 
| 96 | FENG ge | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | 
| 97 | ENRILE Erica | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | 
| 98 | GUO Luxi | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - | 
| 99 | NEMETH Katherine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 31% | 3% | 
| 99 | GUAN Isabella | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | 
| 101 | SUN Renee R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 21% | 3% | 
| 102 | KIM Jayna | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | - | 
| 103 | SAID Riana | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | 
| 104 | JUN Bomie | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 105 | LAN Alice S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 27% | |
| 106 | XU Katelyn | 100% | 95% | 70% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 107 | LEE REGINA | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | 
| 108 | KIM Zoe L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% | 
| 109 | ZHAO Alina | 100% | 85% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - | 
| 110 | TYTELL Elizabeth | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | 
| 111 | SENYUVA Su | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - | 
| 112 | CHOI Grace | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% | 
| 113 | GEVA Eliana | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | 
| 114 | POPOVICI Alina B. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - | 
| 115 | NEELAM Neha | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - | 
| 116 | WANG Angelina | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - | 
| 117 | YAO KATHARINE | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% | 
| 118 | BARG Margaret | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | 
| 119 | PANT Anisha | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | 
| 119 | LIU Nicole | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | 
| 121 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 7% | - | 
| 122 | YOU Isabel B. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | 
| 123 | KUMAR Anusha | 100% | 82% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - | 
| 124 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | 
| 125 | SCHMITT Harper | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 3% | - | - | 
| 126 | WATTANAKIT Anda | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% | 
| 127 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | 
| 128 | HU Chelsea | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | 
| 129 | SHEN Yongen | 100% | 87% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - | 
| 130 | POON Desiree | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - | 
| 131 | SIMHADRI Meghana | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | 
| 132 | CANNING Charlotte | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - | 
| 133 | TANG Elaine | 100% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | 
| 134 | REKEDA Anna | 100% | 73% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - | 
| 135 | NGUYEN Ashley L. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | 
| 136 | BEAVER Kaitlyn | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | 
| 137 | VICKERMAN Lilly | 100% | 89% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - | 
| 138 | PULLEN Ayah | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | 
| 139 | WONG Caitlin | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - | 
| 139 | VARAN Kateryna | 100% | 58% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - | 
| 141 | VICKERMAN Sofia | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | - | 
| 142 | MAGALSKI Mary | 100% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - | 
| 143 | DALEY Keira | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - | 
| 144 | HAU Olivia | 100% | 99% | 82% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | 
| 145 | DOUGLAS Marketa F. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | 
| 146 | HAYNES Antonia | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | 
| 146 | WANG Jessie | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | 
| 148 | PARK Avery | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - | 
| 149 | LEEDER Elizabeth | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 7% | 1% | 
| 150 | DUONG Zoey | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - | 
| 150 | LEWIS Rachel | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | - | 
| 152 | YIN Gabriela | 100% | 86% | 52% | 20% | 4% | 1% | - | 
| 153 | NELSON Grace E. | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | 
| 154 | MIINEA Elena | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | 
| 155 | LEE Camilla | 100% | 91% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | 
| 156 | OLORVIDA Isabella | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - | 
| 157 | CHANG Ella | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | 
| 158 | MACEY Hadley | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - | 
| 159 | MIRZA Annoshae | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - | 
| 160 | CHANG Abigail | 100% | 66% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - | 
| 161 | NIEMAN Aubrey | 100% | 79% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | 
| 162 | MCKENNA Analise | 100% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - | 
| 163 | VICKERMAN Aspen | 100% | 69% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - | 
| 164 | XU Celina | 100% | 66% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - | 
| 165 | CHUANG Ramona | 100% | 73% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - | 
| 166 | LIN Ariel | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | - | 
| 167 | DAVIS Elisabeth | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - | 
| 168 | LEE Samantha X. | 100% | 81% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | 
| 169 | KUDRYAVTSEVA Margarita | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 170 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - | 
| 171 | LAI Amanda | 100% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - | 
| 172 | HASIM Eurietta | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - | 
| 172 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | 
| 174 | LIANG Jingjing | 100% | 80% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | 
| 175 | DONDISCH Andrea | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - | 
| 176 | BLANCO Ariia | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - | 
| 177 | ZHENG Linden | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - | 
| 177 | BHATT Anisha | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - | 
| 177 | MIHILL Margaret | 100% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - | 
| 177 | FRAGER Soleil | 100% | 83% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - | 
| 181 | PATIL Amulya | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - | 
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.