Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | STARKS-FAULKNER Jennette | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
| 2 | WALTERS Anne-Marie | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 52% | 21% |
| 3 | GUTKOVSKAYA Nora | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 6% |
| 3 | LOVE Georgina | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 5 | TRELOAR Allison F. | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 6 | MARX Suzanne Brown | - | - | 2% | 17% | 39% | 34% | 8% |
| 7 | WHITT Lynnette A. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 8 | MERRITT Elizabeth (Badger) E. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 48% |
| 9 | HUEY Sharone A. | - | - | 4% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 5% |
| 10 | HERMES Kathleen A. | - | 4% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 11 | AMISTOSO Jeanne | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
| 12 | GUNTRUM Pamella (Pam) L. | 2% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 13 | BERARDI Gladys B. | 5% | 38% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 14 | CARNEY Dorothy | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 15 | TASKER Monisha B. | 1% | 16% | 42% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 16 | JACKSON Wilma S. | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 17 | ECKSTEIN Harriet A. | 22% | 47% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 18 | EL-SALEH S.S. Rachel | 32% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 19 | ALZONA Esperanza P. | 6% | 29% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 20 | KARPMAN Laura | 17% | 44% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 21 | MORO Diana | 79% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.