Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LUNG Katerina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% |
| 2 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% |
| 3 | PEVZNER Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
| 3 | TAKAMIZAWA Yukari | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 39% |
| 5 | ZHANG Yunjia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% |
| 6 | CHUSID Mikayla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% |
| 7 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% |
| 8 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% | |
| 9 | LIU Jaelyn A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% |
| 10 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% |
| 11 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% |
| 11 | JANG Kimberley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 48% |
| 13 | SUN Ruoxi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 25% | |
| 14 | LUO Sandra J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 13% |
| 15 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% | 17% |
| 16 | LI Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 20% | 2% |
| 17 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% |
| 18 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% |
| 19 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 19% |
| 20 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% | |
| 20 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | |
| 22 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 75% |
| 23 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% |
| 24 | MI Aileen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 26% | 2% |
| 25 | PENG Amber L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 9% |
| 26 | GLASSON Sophia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 11% |
| 27 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 14% | |
| 28 | COOPER Piper W. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 31% | 4% | |
| 29 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 29% | ||
| 30 | RANDOLPH Piper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 21% |
| 31 | HAYES Nadia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 24% | 2% |
| 32 | CALISE Ella | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 22% | 2% | |
| 33 | SENIC Adeline | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% |
| 34 | FEDELI Caterina S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 52% | |
| 35 | YANG Iris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | 7% |
| 36 | LAMBERT Mahala | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 34% | 4% |
| 37 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 10% | 1% |
| 38 | LEE Allison | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 39 | CHOW Annabelle | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% | |
| 40 | SEO IRENE Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 34% | ||
| 41 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 17% |
| 42 | PANT Anisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | 3% |
| 43 | SONG Yuqiao Aprille | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | 9% |
| 44 | SHEN Emilia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 5% | - |
| 45 | ZHANG Eunice | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
| 46 | LIN Zhi tong | 100% | 100% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 47 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 39% |
| 48 | LIU Angel(Daying) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 33% | 3% |
| 49 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 50 | CHEW Alexis T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 8% |
| 51 | SUN Emily | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 52 | FUNG Emma | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 14% | 1% |
| 53 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 18% | |
| 54 | ZHENG Julie | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 13% | 1% | |
| 55 | O'NEIL Neve | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 4% | |
| 56 | SHENG Chuxi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | 1% |
| 57 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 30% | 3% |
| 58 | GOOR Viviene E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
| 59 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 6% |
| 60 | BATRA Chaahat | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 34% | 6% |
| 61 | LAI Sophia | 100% | 98% | 80% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 62 | STRUGAR Steliana | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 9% | - |
| 63 | DO Leila | 100% | 97% | 73% | 30% | 5% | - | - |
| 64 | CHEN Chloe I. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 6% | |
| 65 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 65 | LEE Ji Ahn | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 67 | ROY Layla | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
| 68 | RAO Sonia D. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 69 | LIN Victoria T. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 70 | FUNG Vera | 100% | 97% | 75% | 36% | 8% | - | |
| 71 | GU Emily | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 7% | |
| 72 | MEI Sarah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 4% |
| 73 | CHARALEL Jessica | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 74 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 31% | 2% |
| 75 | WANG Jasmine | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 76 | CHEN Renee | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 77 | KIM Rachel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% | 2% |
| 78 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 29% | 4% |
| 79 | OTEYZA Camille | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 80 | BIODROWICZ Julia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% | - |
| 81 | ZHOU Catherine | 100% | 93% | 60% | 18% | 2% | ||
| 82 | SHUM Maya | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 83 | HAN Crystal | 100% | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 84 | SHIM Grace J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | 9% | - |
| 85 | ZULUETA Catherine | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 86 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 87 | CANNON Lira J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 9% |
| 88 | HUBERT AVA CLAIRE | 100% | 85% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 89 | SULTER Aurelie | 100% | 97% | 72% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
| 90 | HU Felice | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 91 | LEE Fiona E. | 100% | 94% | 65% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 92 | CHANG Elizabeth | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 23% | 2% | |
| 93 | PAULUS Isabella | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 94 | HAN Ashley | 100% | 88% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 95 | ZHANG Selena | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 96 | LENZ Zoe N. | 100% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 97 | FOURNET-FAYARD Yaretzi | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
| 98 | WEI Angela | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 99 | LEVY Avery | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 29% | 4% | - |
| 100 | PARK Leah | 100% | 96% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 101 | UNGERER Frieda | 100% | 93% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 101 | NEUMAN Sophie | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 103 | VAUGHAN Norah | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 104 | VO Bao-Vy | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 105 | MU Allison | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 106 | GOLLNICK Mira | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 107 | BEAVER Hannah | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 108 | LIN Ju-An Adrianne | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 109 | SUN Chien-Yu | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 15% | 1% |
| 110 | MCKAY Teresa | 100% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 111 | HOBSON Ava | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 112 | EVELAND Zoe | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 113 | PATTERSON Natalia | 100% | 86% | 42% | 9% | 1% | ||
| 114 | YIM Rachael | 100% | 58% | 15% | 1% | - | ||
| 115 | BAWA Sahana | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 116 | KO Claire | 100% | 84% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 117 | GUAN Sophie | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 118 | NIKOLIC Alexandra | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 12% | 1% | |
| 119 | CASTANEDA Keira | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 120 | SIMONOV Dasha | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 121 | HWANG Alison | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% | 1% |
| 122 | MORALES Paulina | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 123 | LANDMAN Charlotte | 100% | 74% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 124 | HAYES Alyssa R. | 100% | 99% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 125 | HSIEH Sabrina | 100% | 79% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 126 | BOLES Amanda X. | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 127 | PAULUS Sloane | 100% | 89% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 128 | LI Eleanor | 100% | 90% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 129 | BASSIK Eva | 100% | 99% | 77% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
| 130 | GANDLURI Sreehitha (Sarah) | 100% | 74% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 131 | NAIR Supriya | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 132 | YAN Noelle | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 133 | WANG Reese | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 134 | KUNDU TRISHA | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 135 | GUAN Sydney | 100% | 79% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 135 | LUH Mia P. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 137 | QUINN Anna | 100% | 72% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 138 | REYNOLDS Lourdes | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 138 | YERRAMSETTI Hansika | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 140 | LIU Elinda | 100% | 61% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 141 | ROHRING Anna | 100% | 69% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 142 | WANG Celine S. | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 143 | ZHUANG Sophie | 100% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 144 | ZHENG Zoe | 100% | 45% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 145 | WANG Brina | 100% | 97% | 74% | 32% | 6% | - | - |
| 146 | NIRGUDE Siddhi | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 147 | HAN Katherine | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 148 | MARTIRE Alessandra | 100% | 96% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 149 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 100% | 83% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 149 | HOOGSTRA Lucy | 100% | 54% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 151 | PARK Jacqueline | 100% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 152 | BUDKO Julia | 100% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 153 | GADIYARAM Sushama | 100% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 153 | TAN Isabella | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.