Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | EPPLY-SCHMIDT Paul | - | - | - | 6% | 39% | 54% |
2 | LAWRENCE John W. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 47% | 30% |
3 | LEBLANC Gerald (Jerry) A. | - | 9% | 38% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
3 | ESTELL Oscar M. | - | - | 3% | 22% | 53% | 22% |
5 | KLEIN Johannes | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% |
6 | DARRICAU Henri J. | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 44% | 19% |
7 | BENNETT Philippe | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% |
8 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
9 | DOURAGHY Jamie M. | - | - | 4% | 25% | 46% | 24% |
10 | KAROLAK Dale W. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
11 | STURGIS Bruce T. | 1% | 11% | 34% | 38% | 14% | 2% |
12 | VOELZ Jim | - | 2% | 18% | 43% | 30% | 7% |
13 | HAYENGA Gary M. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
14 | MARIANI Lou | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% |
15 | CHAMBERS Thomas J. | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
16 | WILBERT Matt | 2% | 19% | 48% | 26% | 5% | - |
17 | GROSS Stephen R. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
18 | CRACRAFT William J. | 2% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
19 | DORFMAN Mitchell (Mitch) J. | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
20 | ZEISS Gary M. | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - |
21 | DRAKE David L. | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
22 | KEENEY Jeff | 1% | 14% | 43% | 35% | 7% | - |
23 | GLADNICK Michael J. | 14% | 50% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
24 | LIM Richard M. | 5% | 32% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - |
25 | CUNNIFF Joe | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
26 | LANDIS Geoffrey A. | 64% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - |
27 | BLAIR III Ray H. | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
28 | ROGERS Windell | 69% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - |
29 | TIERNEY Luke | 10% | 51% | 33% | 7% | - | - |
29 | CHENG Stephen S. | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.