The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

USA Fencing National Championships & July Challenge

Y-12 Women's Épée

Saturday, July 9, 2022 at 1:00 PM

Minneapolis, MN, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 LEE REGINA V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.4 6 +0.6
2 SMUK Alexandra S. V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
3 WATTANAKIT Anda V V V V V V V V V V D 5.4 6 +0.6
3 TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) V V V V V V V V V V D 5.6 6 +0.4
5 CAFASSO Natalya V V V V V V V V V D 5.1 6 +0.9
6 SHIV Avni V V V V V V V V V D 5.5 6 +0.5
7 BEAVER Ava V V V V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
8 WANG Jessie D V V D V V V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
9 KOZLOWSKI Maya M. V V V V V V V V D 5.7 6 +0.3
10 LEE Claire V V V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
10 WANG Ziqi V V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
12 DEPOMMIER Isabelle V V V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
13 KUMAR Eva V V V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
14 MISHIMA Audrey V V V V V V V V D 4.0 6 +2.0
15 PROFIS Liora V V V D V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
16 MENDOZA zoie D D V V V V V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
17 WANG Victoria V V V V V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
18 PHUKAN Indra V V V D V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
19 STERR Isabella M. D V V V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
20 BEATIE Isabella M. D V V V V V V D 3.1 5 +1.9
21 GUO Luxi V V V V D V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
22 CARRIER Meredith V V V V V D V D 3.9 5 +1.1
23 YILMAZ Pinar V V D V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
24 LEE Camilla V V D V V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
25 WANG Ziqiao V V D V V D V D 2.3 4 +1.7
26 LISCUM Vivian V V D D V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
27 MONOVA Lilyana D V V V D V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
28 NIX Reagan D V V V V D V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
29 QIU Emily V V V D D V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
30 BALAKRISHNAN Trisha V V D V D V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
31 LEE Lavender V D V D V V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
32 KWON Genevie D D D V D V V D 2.1 1 -1.1
33 NOVOJILOV Anastasia V V V V V D D 3.5 5 +1.5
34 KUDRYAVTSEVA Margarita V V V V V D D 4.3 5 +0.7
35 PEI Claire V V V D V V D 3.1 5 +1.9
36 RICHARDSON Meredith V D V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
37 FERREIRA DE MELO Adriana V V D V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
38 CAMAMA Tessa D V D V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
39 SCHMITT Harper V D V D V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
40 LIN Laura V V V D D V D 2.0 4 +2.0
41 PAN Angela D V V V V D V D 3.4 4 +0.6
42 NGUYEN Ella V D V D V V V D 1.9 4 +2.1
43 SHEN Yongen V V D V V D V D 3.9 4 +0.1
44 KALGAONKAR Arohi V D V V D V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
45 HABEK Sophia D V D V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
46 BI Michelle V V D V D V D 1.0 3 +2.0
47 MARTINEZ Christina V D V V D V D 1.1 3 +1.9
48 ABUELFUTUH Sama V V D D V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
49 READ Lyla V D V D D V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
50 FRANGER Macy D D V D V V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
51 LIN Ariel V V V D D D V D 3.7 3 -0.7
52 MEYER Rebecca D V V D D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
53 CUEVA Viola V D V V D D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
54 MOLLINIER Anais V V D V D D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
54 ZHUANG Lauren V D D V V D V D 2.3 3 +0.7
56 WRIGHT Madison V D D D V V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
57 IYER Ishana V D V D D V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
58 GUAN Isabella D D V D V V D 3.4 2 -1.4
59 PILSON Rebecca D D V V D V D 3.3 2 -1.3
60 HEMPHILL Joey V D D V D V D 3.3 2 -1.3
61 KANE Chloe V D V D D V D 1.7 2 +0.3
62 WONG Caitlin V D D V D D V D 3.0 2 -1.0
63 FLITMAN Gabrielle D D D D V V V D 2.0 2 -
64 WANG Sophie Y. D V V D D D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
65 YU Eva D V V D V V D 1.8 4 +2.2
66 WU Jessica D D V V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
67 VALDEZ Emma D V V D V D 2.1 3 +0.9
68 LY Hannah D V V V D D 1.3 3 +1.7
69 SUICO Kyubi Emmanuelle D D D V V V D 2.1 3 +0.9
70 LEE Gloria V D D V V D D 3.8 3 -0.8
71 MCQUEEN Morgan V V D D V D D 2.6 3 +0.4
72 PRESMAN Aerin V V D V D D D 4.4 3 -1.4
73 JIANG Xinchen D V V D V D D 1.9 3 +1.1
74 NEELAM Navya V D D V V D D 3.6 3 -0.6
75 BOWLING Lillian V D V V D D D 3.4 3 -0.4
76 QI Julieanne D D D V V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
77 WORKNEH Lulit D V V D D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
78 HANKINS Morgan D D V D V D 3.9 2 -1.9
79 LEE Valerie V V D D D D 1.8 2 +0.2
80 WANG Zoe D D V D V D D 1.8 2 +0.2
81 TISMENSKY Abigail D D V D D V D 2.0 2 -
82 TISMENSKY Avital D V D V D D D 1.5 2 +0.5
83 KROPP Anne D D D D V V D 2.3 2 -0.3
83 WANG Emma V D V D D D D 2.7 2 -0.7
85 WHITELAW Shyann V V D D D D D 3.7 2 -1.7
86 ELTERMAN Kate D D D V D V D 1.8 2 +0.2
87 WANG Sijia V V D D D D D 1.4 2 +0.6
88 BOROTKO Katerina D V D D D V D 3.6 2 -1.6
89 BURICEA Ada D D D V D V D 3.1 2 -1.1
90 LEE Emma D D D V D V D 1.7 2 +0.3
91 GARINEY tanvi D D V V D D D 1.7 2 +0.3
92 CHERNIS Liah D D V D D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
93 HALE Reagan D V D D D V D 1.3 2 +0.7
94 JORDAN Zoe D V D V D D D 2.6 2 -0.6
95 ZHU Riley D V D D D D 2.4 1 -1.4
96 WANG Sara D D D D V D 2.1 1 -1.1
97 HALE Avery D D V D D 0.7 1 +0.3
98 XU Jessica V D D D D 2.5 1 -1.5
99 COX Allison D V D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
100 WONG Sydney D V D D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
101 WANG Cecilia D D D D D V 2.2 1 -1.2
102 HOY Emmarose D D D V D D 3.0 1 -2.0
103 HU Chloe D D D D D V 0.8 1 +0.2
104 WANG Aria D D V D D D 2.9 1 -1.9
105 MYRAH Vivienne D D D D V D 3.7 1 -2.7
106 BLANCO Ariia D D D V D D 3.6 1 -2.6
107 ZHAO Yanning V D D D D D 2.3 1 -1.3
108 PATTERSON Liliya D D D D V D 1.3 1 -0.3
109 ZHONG Isabell D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
110 CHEN Alina D D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
110 LIANG Angela D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
110 KIM Yeryung D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
110 JAQUISH Zoey D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
114 ZHANG Jane D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
114 TALANDZEVICIUS Sophia D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
116 PARK elli D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
117 JONES Veronica C. D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
117 DAVIS Violet D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
119 SIMHADRI Sanjana D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
120 STERN Savannah D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.