New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SACCOCCIO Nicholas P. | V V D D V | V V V V V | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 2 | WEINKOPF William O. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 3 | LIAO Alex J. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 3 | MARSHALL Ian | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 5 | BATRAK Alexander | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 6 | FU Samuel Y. | D V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 7 | MACRAE Harrison A. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 8 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | V D V D D | V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 9 | CRALEY Thomas M. | D V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 10 | WAN Jason | D V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 11 | HUTTENBACH Koren A. | V D V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 12 | PARK Ryan | D V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 13 | ORTIZ Zachary M. | V D V V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 14 | ANCONA Christopher | D D V V V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 15 | WU Jerry | D D V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 16 | FEDONCHIK Henry J. | D D V D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 17 | PELOSKY Zack B. | V V V D V D | D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 18 | BRINTON III Robert H. | V D V V V D | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 19 | IVARSSON Oliver | V V D V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 20 | HOWARD Michael | D V D V V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 21 | KWON Ethan | V V D D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 22 | BING Charles | V V V D D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 23 | BAE Kevin | V V D D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 24 | YULDASHEV Timur | V V D D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 25 | BREIER Matthew F. | V D D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 26 | SPOSATO Luke B. | D D V D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 27 | JIN Dennis H. | D D D V V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 28 | SHIN Joshua J. | V D V D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 29 | QI Steve | V D D D D V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 30 | GALBAN Matthias L. | D D D D D | V D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 31 | ROTHCHILD Matthew | D D D D D | V D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 32 | ALIMI Yacine A. | D D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 33 | ROCCABELLO Logan A. | D V D D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 34 | ZHAO Jesse | D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 35 | VITKAUSKAS Justin G. | D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 36 | STAFFA Bennet | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 37 | PANDYA Poojan | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.