University of Maryland, College Park Campus - Reckord Armory - College Park, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | RUNIONS Emersyn | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 2 | YANG Alisa | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 3 | LAWSON Marie A. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
| 3 | PAPADAKIS Lily | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% |
| 5 | DESAI Meera P. | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 6% |
| 6 | WITTER Catherine A. | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 7 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 8 | SWEET Ryleigh E. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | GUJJA Misha | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 10 | LIU Nicole | 1% | 16% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 11 | LIN Elaine | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% |
| 12 | KORFONTA Jolie | - | - | 1% | 4% | 19% | 41% | 34% |
| 13 | MCSHINE Katelyn H. | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 14 | YOU Emily | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 15 | POLANICHKA Nicole P. | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% |
| 16 | NI Emma | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
| 17 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
| 18 | PEELER Julia | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 19 | WU Fan | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 20 | LEE Yedda | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 21 | GORDET Cristina G. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 22 | ASHER Valerie | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 23 | ZHU Serene M. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 24 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 38% | 14% |
| 25 | UPHAM Karolyn | 6% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 26 | GIBLIN Christina K. | - | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 27 | MACE Eliza M. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
| 28 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
| 29 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | - | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 2% |
| 30 | BOWIE Charlotta | 8% | 33% | 36% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 31 | MING Cynthia | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 32 | SMITH Auynha | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 33 | DIAZ Brenna | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 34 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | 16% | 36% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | BOGDANOVSKAYA Elizaveta | 71% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 36 | ERDMAN Giselle | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | MACEDON Gianna | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | MORET Brighid E. | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 39 | BRISK Angelica A. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 40 | LIU Sydney | 17% | 43% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | GIFFORD Sally | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 42 | JEANDHEUR Carole A. | 38% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.