Catonsville, MD - Catonsville, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 45% | 39% | |
| 2 | PENTON Robert | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 14% | |
| 3 | MATT Chris | - | - | 3% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 9% |
| 3 | DOARES Andrew | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
| 5 | FERRARA Nicholas S. | - | 6% | 26% | 42% | 22% | 3% | |
| 6 | CHANG Eliot A. | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 11% | |
| 7 | HAMMER Peter A. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 18% | |
| 8 | SUORSA Markus | 55% | 38% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 9 | GILMORE Thomas W. | - | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
| 10 | PARK Collin D. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 51% | 26% | |
| 11 | MALNATI Donald H. | - | 3% | 24% | 55% | 17% | 1% | |
| 12 | RODRIGUEZ Desmond L. | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
| 13 | ELDER John | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 14 | BAKER Keith L. | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 15 | KENNEDY Liam A. | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% | |
| 16 | STONE Christopher A. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 3% | - |
| 17 | HENSHAW Joseph | 2% | 17% | 44% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 18 | LILLY Nathaniel M. | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 19 | PINCUS Gary J. | 2% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 20 | KEESING Ron | 25% | 45% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 21 | REAMER Aaron M. | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 22 | CHIN Matthew W. | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 23 | GORMAN Liam | 19% | 53% | 24% | 3% | - | - | |
| 24 | KEISER Randy S. | 26% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 25 | MELERINE Dillon | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.