Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center - Atlanta, GA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ANDREEV Ilia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 46% | 11% |
2 | MELLONE Carl (Carlo) J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 56% |
3 | XUE Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% |
3 | DOARES Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% |
5 | SILVA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 42% | |
6 | HONG Steven | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% | |
7 | SCHNEIDER Allen J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 8% |
8 | ARDOIN Cameron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | 8% |
9 | PENTON Robert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 31% |
10 | SEOL Kyung | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 12% |
11 | AN Damon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 9% |
12 | ANAND Rohan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 7% | - |
13 | KELLNER Taylor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
14 | SHANKWILER Christopher | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% | - |
15 | DELARUE Nelson Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 22% |
16 | LISSO Ria A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 8% |
17 | SCHUTZ Katherine G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 18% |
18 | EDWARDS Darby | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% | |
19 | PALEO Gabriella | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 19% | 2% | |
20 | MONTALVO Ashur | 100% | 97% | 76% | 32% | 5% | - | |
21 | GRAHAM Ian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 23% | 2% |
22 | ORLOFSKY Sydney | 100% | 100% | 99% | 64% | 17% | 1% | - |
23 | JAYASANKAR Hari | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 30% | 5% |
24 | MONTALVO Emmeric | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 20% | 2% | |
25 | HARDISON Terry (Reno) | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
26 | BRUNER Thomas | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 5% | - |
27 | VAN NIMWEGEN Nicholas | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
28 | JARDIM Kyle A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
28 | SCHIPPER Bonnie | 100% | 90% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
30 | MUSSELMAN Matthew | 100% | 92% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
31 | GIBBS Mason | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 29% | 4% | |
32 | BURLESON Aidan J. | 100% | 98% | 70% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
33 | LOFGREN Reese | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 10% | 1% |
34 | RYAN Alyssa | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
35 | HAGEN Samuel | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 11% | 1% | |
36 | CHRISTY Alex | 100% | 92% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | |
37 | QI Parker | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% |
38 | PROUDNIK Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
39 | TRUBEY Elise | 100% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
40 | WANG Andy | 100% | 70% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - |
41 | MERRIMAN Morgan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 14% | 1% |
41 | NAWAZ Taimoor | 100% | 90% | 50% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
41 | THACKERAY Caden | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
44 | YU Johnathan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
45 | MCCLURE Morgan | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
46 | ADAMSON Garren | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
47 | HARKONEN Eemil | 100% | 73% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
48 | BALLOU Johnathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 12% | 1% |
49 | BOWMAN Tamara E. | 100% | 74% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
50 | CROWLEY James | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - |
51 | MEYERS Lucas | 100% | 81% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
52 | WOLF Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | - |
53 | STRAW Miles | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
54 | LIONBERGER Gillian | 100% | 57% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
55 | PRUITT Jadie | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
56 | CROSS Phoenix | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
57 | STEWART Madeline | 100% | 78% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | |
58 | TAYLOR Kathleen | 100% | 87% | 43% | 7% | - | - | - |
60 | MOORE Noah | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 1% | - |
61 | HARPER Rebecca | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
61 | BRANNER Christian | 100% | 92% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.