12th Annual Yellow Jacket Open

Div III Mixed Foil

Sunday, February 27, 2022 at 12:00 PM

Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center - Atlanta, GA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 BERNABE Rafael 100% 100% 94% 74% 40% 13% 2%
2 WANG Brayden 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 56% 12%
3 MAXWELL CJ F. 100% 100% 99% 91% 62% 25% 4%
3 LI Sophia M. 100% 99% 93% 71% 34% 8% 1%
5 ROSS III Paul D. 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 64% 22%
6 WEBB Jacob T. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 86%
7 ELLINGTON Keegan A. 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 58% 17%
8 VIVEROS Antonio 100% 99% 94% 76% 44% 15% 2%
9 MOE Annan 100% 100% 98% 81% 43% 11% 1%
10 ZOU Yuming 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 46% 12%
11 LABROZZI Aidan 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 61% 20%
13 LIU Darren 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 65% 21%
14 WATERS Samantha M. 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 47% 3%
15 AWAN Saqlain A. 100% 100% 98% 87% 61% 27% 5%
16 VINEL ALEKSANDR 100% 100% 100% 95% 76% 40% 9%
17 LANDMAN Charlotte 100% 100% 98% 84% 48% 13% 1%
18 MALLOY Patrick G. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 77%
19 CAMPBELL Justin 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 52% 3%
20 NOVIKOV Allegra 100% 97% 81% 46% 14% 1% -
21 HUSSAIN Mustafa 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 82% 40%
22 BATRA Dev 100% 100% 96% 80% 48% 17% 3%
23 WILLIAMS Kenneth H. 100% 100% 99% 91% 63% 22%
24 VAUGHAN Norah 100% 100% 100% 94% 70% 29% 4%
25 EDWARDS Darby 100% 93% 66% 30% 8% 1% -
26 FELIX Ian 100% 100% 97% 81% 49% 18% 3%
27 PAVLINEC John (Jack) C. 100% 100% 95% 74% 38% 11% 1%
28 STORER Alex 100% 100% 99% 90% 65% 30% 7%
29 BRUSH Sydney 100% 95% 73% 34% 7% 1% -
30 MEIGHAN Joshua 100% 100% 100% 95% 75% 39% 9%
31 VIVEROS Oscar A. 100% 100% 99% 93% 66% 27% 4%
32 RAY William 100% 99% 89% 61% 26% 6% 1%
33 MAO Rebecca J. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 86% 39%
34 YIM Rachael 100% 89% 55% 20% 3% -
35 MILLETTE Brigid A. 100% 100% 98% 77% 20% 1%
36 SAMAHA Nicholas J. 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 58% 19%
37 MAXWELL Austin 100% 100% 98% 88% 59% 24% 4%
38 YERRAMSETTI Hansika 100% 95% 73% 35% 8% 1% -
39 HERNANDEZ Veronica L. 100% 100% 99% 79% 37% 7% 1%
40 PALEO Gabriella 100% 99% 92% 67% 29% 4% -
41 EVELAND Zoe 100% 95% 70% 33% 9% 1% -
42 GRAY Martha R. 100% 100% 99% 89% 60% 22% 2%
43 WU Velyn 100% 98% 79% 40% 11% 1% -
44 FAN Yuchen 100% 99% 93% 71% 39% 12% 2%
45 KIM Chaevin 100% 100% 95% 58% 12% 1% -
46 RODRIGUEZ Beni A. 100% 97% 81% 47% 15% 2% -
47 NOVIKOV Sienna 100% 100% 96% 72% 34% 9% 1%
48 LEE David 100% 96% 78% 43% 13% 2% -
49 LIN Ju-An Adrianne 100% 100% 95% 77% 43% 13% 1%
50 KURCHIN Ekaterina Y. 100% 94% 68% 32% 9% 1% -
51 MONES Jesse 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 36% 8%
52 HUFFMAN Taeli 100% 95% 70% 31% 7% - -
53 HARTMANS Jae 100% 85% 47% 15% 2% -
54 BUTFILOSKI Cooper B. 100% 100% 95% 79% 47% 17% 3%
55 MADSEN Ansley 100% 95% 72% 35% 9% 1% -
56 GADIYARAM Madhav 100% 97% 74% 33% 6% - -
57 SARAVANABHAVAN Nila 100% 100% 95% 74% 32% 6% -
58 CHIU Melissa 100% 99% 92% 68% 32% 8% 1%
59 LI Alex 100% 100% 98% 85% 55% 21% 4%
60 BOTKIN Elizabeth 100% 91% 61% 24% 5% - -
61 EVANS Graeme 100% 100% 98% 85% 53% 17% 2%
62 EVANS Cole 100% 100% 94% 73% 35% 6%
63 YOO Joseph 100% 100% 94% 69% 31% 6% -
64 ERBEN Samuel 100% 93% 63% 24% 4% - -
65 YOO Kristie 100% 42% 6% - - - -
66 MUSSELMAN Matthew 100% 99% 89% 61% 27% 7% 1%
67 GADIYARAM Sushama 100% 88% 53% 19% 3% - -
68 MACK Jacob 100% 82% 45% 15% 3% - -
69 DAILEY John 100% 97% 68% 26% 5% - -
70 TAYLOR Wilkins 100% 93% 63% 21% 2% - -
71 MCARTHUR Kemp 100% 88% 43% 11% 1% - -
72 MARSHALL Emily 100% 91% 62% 26% 6% 1% -
73 SCHIPPER Bonnie 100% 95% 71% 32% 7% -
74 MATSUNAGA Alysa 100% 38% 6% - - - -
75 MULLER Van 100% 76% 33% 7% 1% - -
76 MATHEW Esther 100% 63% 18% 2% - - -
77 BRUCE Naomi 100% 99% 87% 41% 8% - -
78 WOEHRMAN Madeline 100% 78% 18% 2% - - -
78 JORDAN Christopher 100% 87% 51% 16% 3% - -
78 CALL Mackenzie 100% 86% 51% 18% 3% - -
78 MARKERT Meghan 100% 89% 40% 8% 1% - -
82 BLACK Elias 100% 92% 61% 22% 3% - -
83 FEIDLER Calvin 100% 84% 46% 14% 2% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.