Denver, CO - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TALAVERA Daena | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 40% |
2 | GOMES Rafaella T. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 45% |
3 | LI Phoebe J. | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 56% | 30% |
3 | TONG Ophelia | - | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 9% |
5 | CHEN Nicole Y. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
6 | KIM Kayla A. | - | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 3% | |
7 | HOBSON Leena | 26% | 44% | 25% | 5% | < 1% | - | - |
8 | CHENG Evelyn | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% | |
9 | SOOD Ishani S. | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
10 | THOMAS Aaria S. | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
11 | RAMAN Tanvi | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
12 | OH Erin H. | 2% | 23% | 44% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
13 | VOHRA Anusha | - | 1% | 6% | 29% | 49% | 15% | 1% |
14 | KUMAR Anmol | 6% | 35% | 41% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
15 | XU Marie-Anne J. | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
16 | MILLER Veronica | 12% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
17 | GROGAN Hunter K. | 3% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 7% | - | - |
18 | WANG Yiran (Cindy) | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
19 | SHYU Ellie | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
20 | LIN Joyce | 30% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.