Denver, CO - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | WU Amelia | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
2 | PROCTOR Sara J. | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 4% |
3 | ROSS Naomi O. | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 13% |
3 | CHU Audrey | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 18% |
5 | WOLF Isabella A. | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
6 | KORNGUTH Lindsay | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
7 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | 5% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 4% | |
8 | BUVARP Elisabeth M. | - | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
9 | LEANG Andrea K. | - | 2% | 23% | 47% | 25% | 3% |
10 | NGUYEN Kaylin A. | 1% | 9% | 31% | 43% | 16% | |
11 | PARK Ashley Y. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
12 | BROOKS Tean R. | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
13 | DING Sandra | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
14 | MARTUS Cosima O. | 3% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
15 | MOSKOFF Tessa | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
16 | LEUNG Natalie | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
17 | JOBALIA Ria | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
18 | HASKEL Darby H. | 5% | 31% | 42% | 19% | 3% | |
19 | BEI Karen | 2% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
20 | JIANG Claire | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
21 | REDD Sophie M. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
22 | DARANOUVONG Logan | 2% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
23 | WEBER Nora | 20% | 43% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
24 | SCHMITT Ella | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
25 | GWATHMEY Teryn | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
26 | FOLEY Lauren | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
27 | BARON Sabina | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
28 | MESCHIA Maggie | 19% | 44% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
29 | KENT Elizabeth J. | 26% | 48% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.