BADAWI CHALLENGE RYC/RJCC

Youth 14 Women’s Saber (Y14WS)

Sunday, February 4, 2024 at 12:30 PM

Register

Maverick Activity Center (MAC) - Arlington, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2367 2452 - 2323
5 - 8 2121 2216 - 2019
9 - 16 1793 1962 - 1625
17 - 28 1375 1604 - 798

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Kwon, Hannah Frisco Fencing Academy U 2452 2199.28
2 Xiaö, Cindy Lone Star Fencing Center U 2354 2094.43
3 Sung, Olivia Lone Star Fencing Center E24 2340 2083.28
4 Ku, Alathea-Joy Globus Fencing Academy U 2323 2071.80
5 zhu, Avril Lone Star Fencing Center E24 2216 1965.55
6 Luker, Hannah Lone Star Fencing Center D24 2163 1904.51
7 Lai, Karen Lone Star Fencing Center U 2087 1816.22
8 Moon, Claire Frisco Fencing Academy E24 2019 1758.08
9 Ku, Chloe Globus Fencing Academy U 1962 1677.68
10 Cheron, Helene Frisco Fencing Academy U 1893 1626.89
11 Ko, Ariel Globus Fencing Academy U 1884 1624.67
12 Ye, Madeleine Texas Sabre Academy U 1783 1501.92
13 Zhang, Olivia Globus Fencing Academy U 1744 1453.76
14 Kang, Soeun Frisco Fencing Academy U 1749 1447.98
15 Cherukuri, Tanvi Fencing Institute Of Texas U 1705 1392.01
16 Oei, Allyson Globus Fencing Academy U 1625 1309.79
17 Joshi, Samika Frisco Fencing Academy U 1604 1294.35
18 LU, QIWEN Lone Star Fencing Center U 1533 1185.79
19 Claianu, Adriana Texas Sabre Academy U 1526 1183.65
20 Witek, Isabelle Globus Fencing Academy U 1495 1111.69
21 Meade, Kaia Texas Sabre Academy U 1375 1011.00
22 Oh, Chloe Globus Fencing Academy U 1317 956.11
23 Cha, Jungyun Frisco Fencing Academy U 1418 889.00
24 Ham, Elizabeth Globus Fencing Academy U 1291 843.44
25 Guajardo, Yisel North Dallas Fencing Club U 1578 517.64
26 Sachdev, Aryaa Globus Fencing Academy U 1320 482.03
27 Edelbrock, Kate Frisco Fencing Academy U 798 210.38
28 Balan, Johana U 1245 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!