Denver, CO - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 2 | LEE Alexandra B. | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 35% | 8% | |
| 3 | ZINNI Kaylyn M. | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 8% | |
| 3 | SEHIC Cassandra | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
| 5 | HAYES Grace Y. | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 35% | 10% | |
| 6 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 7 | HURST Kennedy | - | 5% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 3% | |
| 8 | D'ORAZIO Isabella | 3% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 9 | JOHNSON Cliona G. | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 37% | 10% | |
| 10 | LIM Isabel K. | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 11 | SKAGGS Natalie M. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 12 | ROGERS Pauline E. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
| 13 | MARSEE Samantha | - | - | 3% | 13% | 36% | 42% | 6% |
| 14 | DRAEKER Margaret | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 15 | IYER Mohini R. | 9% | 42% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 16 | MESCHIA Maggie | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 17 | ZHOU Melanie | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 18 | HOLMES Emma | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - | |
| 19 | COLTER Aurora | 64% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.