Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LIU Jinning | D V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 2 | LOZADA Gabriel G. | V V V D V | V V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 3 | MCQUIDE Elliot | D D D V D | V V V V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 3 | THADHANI Elio | V D D D D V | V V V V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 5 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 6 | XIAO Bowen | V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 7 | SUTARIA Julian | V V V D V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 8 | ZHENG Harrison | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 9 | LI Ayren | V V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 6 | +2.5 |
| 10 | AMRANI David | V V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 11 | BAO Chris W. | V D V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 12 | BOUSSY Luciano | V V V D D | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 13 | DOHONEY Tommy | V V D D V | V V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 14 | WOHLERS Trevor | V V D D D | V V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 15 | TAN Benjamine | D V V D D D | V V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 16 | BANSAL Rahul | D D V D D | V V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 17 | WILSON Samuel S. | V V V V V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 18 | COFFIN Carleton | D V V V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 19 | KONDOR James | V V D V V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 20 | BALDWIN Benjamin | V V D V V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 21 | VO Jonathan | D V V V V | V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 22 | CUTLER Andrew | V D D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 23 | MURDOCH ROY Charlie | V V V D D | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 24 | HAZLETT Grady | V V D D V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 25 | LACHAPELLE Cole | D D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 26 | DJONOUMA Toyohm | D V V V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 27 | FENG Michael | V D V D V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 28 | TIBBETTS Justin | D V V D D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 29 | DENG Kenny | D V D D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 30 | DALOMBA Kingston | D D D V V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 31 | ZHAO Brandon | V V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 32 | REN Bingye | V D D V D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 33 | RIPA Joseph K. | V D V V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 34 | ABRUZZESE Owen | V V D V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 35 | GREENLEAF Paul | D V V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 36 | YANG David | D V V V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 37 | WANG Qiqi | V D V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 38 | HOLCOMB Cedric | D D V V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 39 | HO Jor Sam | D D V V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 40 | EBERMAN Henry | V D D V D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 41 | SURESH Rohan | D D D V V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 42 | OLLARI John W. | V D D D V | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 43 | BROGAN Kevin | V D D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 44 | BISHOP Henry | V D V D D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 45 | CRANE William | D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 46 | STAFFORD Gareth | D D D V D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 47 | DANGELO Connor | D D D D V | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 48 | YANG Samuel | D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 49 | WALSH Frederic | D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 50 | WANG Yantao | D D V D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 51 | JIN Hin Hei | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 52 | MENG Guangnan | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 53 | LOPES Ryan | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 54 | BERGERON Justin | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 55 | CUTLER Thomas Scott | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.