Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIU Jinning | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
| 2 | LOZADA Gabriel G. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% | |
| 3 | MCQUIDE Elliot | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 3 | THADHANI Elio | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 5 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% | |
| 6 | XIAO Bowen | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 40% | |
| 7 | SUTARIA Julian | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
| 8 | ZHENG Harrison | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
| 9 | LI Ayren | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 10 | AMRANI David | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |
| 11 | BAO Chris W. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% | |
| 12 | BOUSSY Luciano | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 17% | |
| 13 | DOHONEY Tommy | 9% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 14 | WOHLERS Trevor | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 18% | |
| 15 | TAN Benjamine | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 16 | BANSAL Rahul | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 17 | WILSON Samuel S. | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 31% | |
| 18 | COFFIN Carleton | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 40% | 17% | |
| 19 | KONDOR James | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 20 | BALDWIN Benjamin | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
| 21 | VO Jonathan | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 22 | CUTLER Andrew | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 23 | MURDOCH ROY Charlie | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 24 | HAZLETT Grady | 8% | 35% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | LACHAPELLE Cole | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 26 | DJONOUMA Toyohm | 3% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 27 | FENG Michael | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 28 | TIBBETTS Justin | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | DENG Kenny | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 30 | DALOMBA Kingston | 5% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 31 | ZHAO Brandon | 1% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
| 32 | REN Bingye | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
| 33 | RIPA Joseph K. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
| 34 | ABRUZZESE Owen | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 35 | GREENLEAF Paul | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 36 | YANG David | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 37 | WANG Qiqi | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 38 | HOLCOMB Cedric | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% | |
| 39 | HO Jor Sam | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 40 | EBERMAN Henry | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 41 | SURESH Rohan | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 42 | OLLARI John W. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 34% | 10% | |
| 43 | BROGAN Kevin | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 44 | BISHOP Henry | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 45 | CRANE William | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 46 | STAFFORD Gareth | 55% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 47 | DANGELO Connor | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 48 | YANG Samuel | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
| 49 | WALSH Frederic | 3% | 26% | 45% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 50 | WANG Yantao | 1% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 2% | |
| 51 | JIN Hin Hei | 4% | 29% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 52 | MENG Guangnan | 4% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 53 | LOPES Ryan | 2% | 22% | 43% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 54 | BERGERON Justin | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 55 | CUTLER Thomas Scott | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.