Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SHACHANIN Searhei | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 2 | CHOI Hyunseok | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 3 | HARE John R. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 3 | CALLAHAN Jaden P. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 5 | GOLDMAN Noah R. | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 6 | TRAVERS Samir T. | V V V D D V | V V D | 5.8 | 4 | -1.8 |
| 7 | MICHELL Bailey | D D V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 8 | KIM Shaun M. | D D D D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 9 | TUPPER Edward A. | V V V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 10 | GONG Jerry | V V V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 11 | BAE Jason I. | D V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 12 | HOFFMAN Timothy R. | V V V D D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 13 | KAPOOR Tanmay | D V V D V V | V D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
| 14 | SHANAHAN Adam E. | V V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 15 | RODRIGUEZ Darlin | D D V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 16 | PENG Bryan | D D V D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 17 | BUENAVENTURA Christian | V V D V V | D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 18 | DOLAN Charles R. | D V V V V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 19 | RAI Avin | V V D V V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 20 | NG Jeremiah | V V V V D D | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 21 | PIWOWAR Alex | D V V V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 22 | SHAHZAD Azlan A. | V D V V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 23 | LO Alexander | D V D V D V | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 24 | MORALES Jonathan | D D D V V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 25 | HUANG Tom | D D V D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 26 | HUROWITZ Max | V D D V D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 27 | PANEPINTO HATTORI Fernando | V D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 28 | COUNTS Nicholas | D D D V V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 29 | PERRON Robert | V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 30 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 31 | MACGREGOR Colin D. | D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 32 | WEN Edward | V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 33 | CHENG Brandon | D D D D V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 | |
| 34 | CARTER Jackson | D V D D D D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 | |
| 35 | BROGAN Kevin | V D D D D D | 1.0 | 1 | - | |
| 36 | BONDARENCO Vlad | D D D D D D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 | |
| 37 | LI Yao (Liam) | D D D D D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 | |
| 38 | AVRAMIS Adam | D D D D D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 | |
| 39 | PODDAR Shameek | D D D D D D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.