Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | DI TELLA Isabel | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 2 | LUO Ashley | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | DAVIS Jessica L. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 3 | SMITH Grace L. | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 5 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 6 | YU Nicole J. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 7 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 8 | BOUDREAU Justine | V D D D D | V V V D | 3.8 | 1 | -2.8 |
| 9 | SCHMIDT Lori M. | V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 10 | LONADIER Keira | V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 11 | COBERT Helen G. | V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 12 | XUE Alanna L. | D V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 13 | HOPKINS Leila | D V V V V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 14 | PAN Michelle | V D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 15 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | V V D V D | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 16 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | D D V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 17 | CALDWELL Phoebe | V V V V D V | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 | |
| 18 | FENG Ge | D V V V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 19 | SPRINGER Sierra | V D V V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 20 | CANNING Charlotte | V V D D V V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 21 | GORDET Cristina G. | V V D V D V | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 22 | BENNETT Olivia | V V V D D V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 23 | SHU Youshan | V D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 24 | BENZAN India | D V D V V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 25 | MCSHINE Katelyn H. | D D V V V D | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 26 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | V D V D V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 27 | LI Suri | V V D D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 28 | LI Fei | V D V D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 29 | KUDIEROVA Anastasiia | D V D D V | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 30 | CONNOLLY Natasha | V D V D D | V D | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 |
| 31 | BALSKUS Sophia | D D D V V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 32 | AMOROSO Elizabeth | D V D D V | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 33 | POLANICHKA Nicole P. | D V V V D | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 34 | KELLY Diane A. | D D D V V | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 35 | SONG Angela | D V D D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 36 | YING Julia Y. | D V D D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 37 | PRIHODKO Nina | V D V D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 38 | WEINSIER Ryan | V D D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 39 | SIU Maple | D V D V D | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
| 40 | WOLF Lisa A. | V D V D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 41 | SHEIN Evita | V D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 42 | ZAFFT Sharrie A. | D D V D D | D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
| 43 | HUANG Ziyan | V D D D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 44 | BYRON Karen J. | D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 45 | ETZEL Rowan | D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 46 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | V D D D D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 | |
| 47 | SAAL Anna | D D V D D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 | |
| 48 | CHOY Ida | D V D D D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 | |
| 48 | SOTELO Michelle | D V D D D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 | |
| 50 | RABIDOUX Skyler L. | D D D D V D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 | |
| 51 | JENSEN MJ | D D D V D D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 | |
| 52 | MASTRONARDI Laura | D D D D D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 | |
| 53 | SONG Jaeyi | D D D D D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 | |
| 54 | INAMDAR Nina S. | D D D D D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 | |
| 55 | SIU Hazel | D D D D D D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 | |
| 56 | LEE Hwaeun | D D D D D D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.