Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DI TELLA Isabel | - | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 84% |
| 2 | LUO Ashley | - | - | 2% | 15% | 46% | 37% | |
| 3 | DAVIS Jessica L. | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 14% | |
| 3 | SMITH Grace L. | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 42% | 16% | |
| 5 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 51% | 21% |
| 6 | YU Nicole J. | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% | |
| 7 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
| 8 | BOUDREAU Justine | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 22% | |
| 9 | SCHMIDT Lori M. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 39% | |
| 10 | LONADIER Keira | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 42% | 29% | |
| 11 | COBERT Helen G. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 48% | 26% | |
| 12 | XUE Alanna L. | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% | |
| 13 | HOPKINS Leila | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 14 | PAN Michelle | - | 7% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | |
| 15 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | - | - | 6% | 28% | 46% | 20% | |
| 16 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 17 | CALDWELL Phoebe | - | - | - | 6% | 27% | 45% | 22% |
| 18 | FENG Ge | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 12% | |
| 19 | SPRINGER Sierra | 2% | 20% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 20 | CANNING Charlotte | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 21 | GORDET Cristina G. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 40% | 4% |
| 22 | BENNETT Olivia | 3% | 22% | 45% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 23 | SHU Youshan | 4% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
| 24 | BENZAN India | 2% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 25 | MCSHINE Katelyn H. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 8% |
| 26 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | - | - | 6% | 27% | 45% | 20% | 1% |
| 27 | LI Suri | 1% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
| 28 | LI Fei | 3% | 21% | 44% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 29 | KUDIEROVA Anastasiia | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
| 30 | CONNOLLY Natasha | 60% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 31 | BALSKUS Sophia | 2% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 32 | AMOROSO Elizabeth | 27% | 48% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 33 | POLANICHKA Nicole P. | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% | |
| 34 | KELLY Diane A. | 33% | 46% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 35 | SONG Angela | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% | |
| 36 | YING Julia Y. | 1% | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 37 | PRIHODKO Nina | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | |
| 38 | WEINSIER Ryan | 13% | 42% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | SIU Maple | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 40 | WOLF Lisa A. | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
| 41 | SHEIN Evita | 4% | 29% | 47% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | ZAFFT Sharrie A. | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
| 43 | HUANG Ziyan | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | BYRON Karen J. | 9% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 45 | ETZEL Rowan | 17% | 43% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | SAAL Anna | - | 5% | 25% | 43% | 23% | 4% | |
| 48 | CHOY Ida | 3% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 48 | SOTELO Michelle | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 50 | RABIDOUX Skyler L. | 56% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | JENSEN MJ | 14% | 46% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 52 | MASTRONARDI Laura | 4% | 27% | 42% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 53 | SONG Jaeyi | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 54 | INAMDAR Nina S. | 3% | 33% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 55 | SIU Hazel | 11% | 44% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | LEE Hwaeun | 54% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.