Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SEIGEL Norah | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 2 | LIN Victoria T. | V V V V D V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 3 | LAO Sophia | V V V D V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 3 | RICHARDS Ella | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 5 | VAYNBERG Ellen | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 6 | MEYER Claudia | D D V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 7 | LOGAN Jade | V D D V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
| 8 | ZHOU Sophia | V D D D D V | V V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 9 | GAO Zhuning | V V V D V V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 10 | OLSEN Jen | V V V D V D | V D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
| 11 | SMIDA Julia | V V D V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 12 | WEI Angela | V D V V V D | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 13 | MURDOCH ROY Grace | V D V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 14 | KYIJONG Tenzin | D V V V D D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 15 | WANG Rachael | D V D D V V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 16 | RIOS Jordan | D D V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 17 | HARROLD Sophia | V D V V V V | D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 18 | GREENLEAF Ella | V V V D V D | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 19 | SONPAL Vivian | V D D V V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 20 | FRIEND Sophie | V V D D V D | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 21 | COELHO Sofia | V V V D D D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 22 | ZHENG Ying | D V D V D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 23 | YEE Melania | D V V D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 24 | POWLEDGE Cora | D V D V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 25 | SAMKO Bern | V D D D V D | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 25 | LINDEN Lucienne | D D D V D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 27 | PLOURDE Meghan E. | D V D D D V | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 28 | MORIN Charlotte | D D D V D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 29 | LUNEAU Isabel | D D V D D V | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 30 | YOUNG Abigail | D D V V D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 31 | KOUZNETSKI Tais | D D D D V D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 32 | FULLER Maybel | D D D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 33 | LI Yixin Catherine | D D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 34 | BURNHAM Sarah | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 35 | WALMSLEY Rowan | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.