Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | JING Emily | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 82% |
| 2 | WANG Ellen | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
| 3 | LUNG Katerina | - | - | - | 7% | 44% | 49% |
| 3 | SHEN Sophia H. | - | 3% | 27% | 49% | 21% | |
| 5 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | 4% | 33% | 63% | |
| 6 | XUE Alanna L. | - | - | 2% | 19% | 51% | 28% |
| 7 | BREKER Anika | - | - | 1% | 13% | 54% | 31% |
| 8 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 46% | 42% |
| 9 | MILLER Naomi E. | - | - | 4% | 24% | 46% | 26% |
| 10 | LI Rachel Y. | - | 2% | 27% | 47% | 21% | 3% |
| 11 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | - | 5% | 40% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 12 | WU Julianna Y. | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 36% | 5% |
| 13 | ZHOU Anna | - | 10% | 43% | 38% | 9% | |
| 14 | GU Emily | - | 1% | 15% | 45% | 36% | 3% |
| 15 | ZHENG Julie | 9% | 62% | 26% | 3% | - | |
| 16 | DU Hannah | - | 2% | 20% | 50% | 25% | 3% |
| 17 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | - | - | 5% | 26% | 45% | 24% |
| 18 | CARTER Jane P. | - | - | 6% | 30% | 48% | 16% |
| 19 | WU Irene M. | - | 2% | 16% | 46% | 33% | 3% |
| 20 | SHEN Lydia | - | 4% | 31% | 52% | 14% | |
| 21 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | 8% | 37% | 44% | 10% | 1% |
| 22 | SEIGEL Norah | 2% | 19% | 47% | 29% | 4% | - |
| 23 | HOU Wendong | 4% | 51% | 38% | 7% | - | - |
| 24 | SHA Yi Ling | 8% | 64% | 26% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | - | 3% | 23% | 43% | 26% | 5% |
| 26 | WANG Jasmine | 3% | 27% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 27 | OLSEN Jen | 5% | 34% | 42% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 28 | FIGUEREDO Maria | 1% | 11% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 2% |
| 29 | XIANG Emma | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 24% | 2% |
| 30 | ACHILOVA Feyza | - | 12% | 52% | 32% | 4% | |
| 31 | MEYER Claudia | 1% | 25% | 52% | 20% | 2% | - |
| 32 | SEGAL Lydia | - | < 1% | 1% | 8% | 39% | 52% |
| 33 | WILBERT Gwendolyn (Gwen) A. | 7% | 72% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | MUSTO Isabella | 3% | 35% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 35 | JING Alexandra | - | 1% | 14% | 46% | 39% | |
| 36 | ZHOU Sophia | 56% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 37 | LIN Victoria T. | 3% | 34% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 38 | ZHOU Catherine | 14% | 49% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 39 | WEI Angela | 21% | 54% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | LAO Sophia | 86% | 13% | - | - | - | |
| 41 | MORIN Charlotte | 70% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 42 | GAO Zhuning | 84% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
| 43 | RICHARDS Ella | 61% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 44 | KYIJONG Tenzin | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 45 | ZHENG Ying | 91% | 9% | - | - | - | - |
| 46 | KOUZNETSKI Tais | 88% | 11% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.