Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | JING Emily | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 2 | WANG Ellen | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 3 | LUNG Katerina | D V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 3 | SHEN Sophia H. | V V V V | V V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 5 | ZHENG Ivy | V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 6 | XUE Alanna L. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 7 | BREKER Anika | V V V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 8 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | V V V D V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 9 | MILLER Naomi E. | V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 10 | LI Rachel Y. | D V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 11 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | V V V V D | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 12 | WU Julianna Y. | V V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 13 | ZHOU Anna | D V V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 14 | GU Emily | D D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 15 | ZHENG Julie | V V D D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 16 | DU Hannah | D D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 17 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | D V V V V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 18 | CARTER Jane P. | V V D V V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 19 | WU Irene M. | V V V D V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 20 | SHEN Lydia | D V V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 21 | LIU Angel(Daying) | V D V V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 22 | SEIGEL Norah | D V D V V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 23 | HOU Wendong | D V V V D | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 24 | SHA Yi Ling | V D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 25 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | V D D V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 26 | WANG Jasmine | V D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 27 | OLSEN Jen | D D V V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 28 | FIGUEREDO Maria | D V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 29 | XIANG Emma | D V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 30 | ACHILOVA Feyza | V D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 31 | MEYER Claudia | V D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 32 | SEGAL Lydia | D D V D D | V D | 4.4 | 1 | -3.4 |
| 33 | WILBERT Gwendolyn (Gwen) A. | V D D D V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 34 | MUSTO Isabella | D V D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 35 | JING Alexandra | D D V D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 | |
| 36 | ZHOU Sophia | D D V D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 37 | LIN Victoria T. | V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 38 | ZHOU Catherine | V D D D D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 | |
| 39 | WEI Angela | V D D D D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 | |
| 40 | LAO Sophia | D D D D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 | |
| 41 | MORIN Charlotte | D D D D D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 | |
| 42 | GAO Zhuning | D D D D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 | |
| 43 | RICHARDS Ella | D D D D D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 | |
| 44 | KYIJONG Tenzin | D D D D D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 | |
| 45 | ZHENG Ying | D D D D D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 | |
| 46 | KOUZNETSKI Tais | D D D D D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.