Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda | - | - | - | 1% | 19% | 79% | |
2 | POSSICK Lola P. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
3 | TZOU Alexandra | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 54% |
3 | KOVACS Sophia | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 49% |
5 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
6 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 60% |
7 | MIKA Veronica | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 20% |
8 | CHIN Erika J. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
9 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 66% |
9 | KIM Zoe | - | - | - | - | 4% | 31% | 65% |
9 | CAO Stephanie X. | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 44% | 29% |
12 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
12 | OLSEN Natalie J. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 23% | |
14 | LI Amanda C. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
15 | MARSEE Samantha | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% | |
16 | VESTEL Mira B. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 18% | |
17 | LEE Alexandra B. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 59% |
18 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
18 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
20 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
21 | KER Grace | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 44% | 14% |
22 | JULIEN Michelle | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 41% | 14% |
23 | ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
24 | HARRISON Imogen N. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 43% | 38% |
25 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | - | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 45% | 12% |
26 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 6% |
27 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | - | 5% | 27% | 47% | 21% | |
28 | ANDRES Katherine A. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
29 | DUCKETT Madison | - | - | 2% | 16% | 40% | 36% | 6% |
30 | ENDO Miyuki N. | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% |
31 | SHI Cathleen | 1% | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
32 | JUNG Irene | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
33 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% |
34 | YONG Erika E. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
35 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% | |
36 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 37% | |
37 | GHAYALOD reya | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 7% |
38 | STONE Hava S. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 39% | 38% | 8% |
39 | PAUL Lila | - | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 5% |
40 | CHIOLDI Mina | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 48% | 11% |
41 | XI Shining | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
42 | PAK Kaitlyn | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% | |
43 | LI Victoria J. | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 32% | 7% | |
43 | DANK Dina | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
45 | CODY Alexandra C. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
46 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
47 | TAO Hannah J. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% |
48 | GORMAN Victoria M. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 41% | 12% |
49 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 25% | 3% |
49 | LEE Hannah | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 41% | 19% | 2% |
51 | NATH Trisha | - | 4% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 4% | - |
52 | TONG Kunling | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
53 | GEYER Carolina M. | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 3% |
54 | LIU Sophie | - | 9% | 43% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
55 | YANG Ashley M. | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
56 | ALCEBAR Kayla | - | 7% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | |
57 | LIN Audrey J. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 15% | |
58 | YUAN Greta | - | 5% | 28% | 43% | 20% | 3% | |
59 | SATHYANATH Kailing | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 44% | 19% |
60 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
61 | SADIK HANA | - | 4% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - |
62 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - |
63 | LIGH Erenei J. | 1% | 12% | 40% | 36% | 11% | 1% | |
64 | BLUM Leah I. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
65 | JOHNSON Lauren | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% |
66 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 44% | 38% |
67 | OISHI Megumi | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
68 | PRIEUR Lauren | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 21% | 3% |
69 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
70 | BOIS Adele | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 40% | 12% | |
71 | MARYASH Samantha | 16% | 43% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
72 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 45% | 20% | 2% |
73 | LU Elaine | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
74 | TONG Jessie | 1% | 13% | 40% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - |
75 | HU Michelle | - | 10% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
76 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
77 | LEE Sophia | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
78 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
79 | SZETO Chloe | - | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 38% | 11% |
80 | NYSTROM Sofia C. | - | 1% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 1% |
81 | ATLURI Sara V. | - | 6% | 22% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
82 | ERIKSON Kira R. | - | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
83 | ZUO Xiaofan | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
84 | ISBERG Natalie | 1% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
85 | LU Amy | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
86 | TSE Angelina | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
87 | JEONG Katie | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
88 | HWANG Gabriela M. | - | 6% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 4% | |
89 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
90 | YANG Angelina LeLe | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
91 | FEARNS Zara A. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 40% | 13% |
92 | KIM Marley I. | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 15% | 1% |
93 | XU Ellen | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 37% | 6% |
94 | FANG Victoria W. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
94 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 6% |
96 | NGUYEN Ella | 2% | 14% | 38% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - |
97 | NOVICK Mia J. | - | 3% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 7% | - |
98 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
98 | SHEARER Natalie E. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
98 | DAVIS Jayna M. | 5% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
101 | WEI Vivian W. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
102 | NGUYEN Siena | 5% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
102 | DENG Brooke | 1% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
104 | HUANG MADELINE | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
105 | HUNG Anna | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
106 | HURST Kennedy | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
107 | HILD Nisha | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
108 | ZENG Megan | 2% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 7% | - | - |
109 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 1% | 8% | 32% | 43% | 15% | 1% | |
110 | KRASTEV Minna | - | 1% | 15% | 42% | 35% | 8% | |
111 | CHANG Emily | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
112 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% | |
113 | CHIN Sophia J. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
114 | JOHNSON Lydia | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
115 | SINHA Anika | 3% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
116 | DILLE Carolina G. | 13% | 40% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - | |
117 | CHIN Elise | 3% | 18% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
118 | NEIBART Fiona | - | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
119 | LUKER Sophia | - | 8% | 35% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - |
120 | FERREIRA Alejandra E. | - | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
121 | WANG Zidan | 4% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
122 | FAN Grace | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
123 | HE Lizbeth | - | 5% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - |
124 | KHAN Alissa | - | 7% | 33% | 40% | 17% | 2% | - |
125 | YANG Lea | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
126 | LIN Nicole | 16% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
127 | MULAGARI Sadhika | 7% | 46% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
128 | CHANG Audrey | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
129 | CHIANG Emily | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
130 | COLTER Aurora | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
131 | SU Emma | - | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
132 | MANN Sophia J. | 21% | 49% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
133 | YERRAMILLI Kavya | 5% | 27% | 43% | 21% | 3% | - | |
134 | BILILIES Sophia | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
135 | KANTIPUDI Shrika | 2% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
136 | DAVIS Charlotte | 10% | 47% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
137 | SCHOEW Margot | 24% | 46% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
138 | NAYAK Indra | - | 11% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - |
139 | MANSPERGER Leena | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
140 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | - | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
141 | MORAN Rhea | 33% | 47% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
142 | FANG sophie | 12% | 45% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
143 | TUNG Renee | 39% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
144 | LIU Sydney | 13% | 52% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
145 | CHANG Josephine S. | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 48% | 7% | |
146 | SOWERS Lia | 38% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
147 | CHEN Celina Z. | 26% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
148 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
149 | ADAMS Morrigan B. | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
150 | ZHIZHIN Jeanette | 23% | 57% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
151 | BAKER Amelia M. | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
152 | TSAI Anna A. | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
153 | WHITESIDES Abigail E. | 2% | 41% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
154 | WU Lanting | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
154 | SCHIKORE Anna M. | 2% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
154 | LEE Lauren | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
157 | CHAPMAN-LAYLAND Astrid M. | 4% | 24% | 45% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
157 | CHEN Kevy | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
159 | PYO Penelope E. | 10% | 48% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
160 | BARRIE Sadie Q. | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
160 | LOMOTAN Addison | 26% | 47% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
162 | CHEN Xinyan | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
163 | ZOLLER Noelle | 9% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
164 | D'ORAZIO Sofia V. | 22% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
164 | BOLTON Eleksi M. | 5% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
164 | TODD Peregrine | 3% | 51% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
167 | CHO Michelle | 12% | 56% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
168 | ELNATAN Mica A. | 19% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
169 | IYER Arushi | 66% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
170 | REGANTI Sitara | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
171 | GEIGER Abigail | 17% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
172 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | 24% | 45% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
173 | NAYAK Mira | 46% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
173 | LIAO Siwen | 9% | 34% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
175 | GRULICH Rayaana | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
176 | HOLMES Sabrina | 87% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
177 | FERGUSON Aliya | 66% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
178 | RODGERS Rachel | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
178 | MEHTA Mary | 75% | 23% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
180 | ABDULLAHI Salma | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
180 | CHEN Athena | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
182 | FREY Sarah E. | 60% | 36% | 4% | - | - | - | |
183 | CARTER Keely | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
183 | FAYETTE Mathilde | 90% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
183 | MCCOY Audrey (Zoe) | 70% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
186 | BURTON Sequoia | 77% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
187 | NEWMARK Ellie | 60% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
188 | BODILY Grace | 92% | 8% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.