Freehold Fencing Academy - Freehold, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | STUSNICK Hunter | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 65% |
2 | REZNICK Nicholas J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 81% | 29% | |
3 | AGAON Shawn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 73% |
3 | SHEN Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 78% | 28% | |
5 | AGAON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 24% |
6 | SHREM Samuel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | |
7 | KHAN Raaid | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 46% | 7% |
8 | LOPEZ-SIMPSON Victor | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% |
9 | LEVCHOOK Thomas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 31% | 2% |
10 | NOVOJILOV Alexei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 29% | |
11 | KRISHNAN Skanda | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
12 | AGAON Evelyn | 100% | 86% | 45% | 9% | - | |
13 | BHATT Krishna | 100% | 98% | 73% | 30% | 5% | - |
14 | BLAKESLEE Garrett | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 15% | 1% |
15 | HALM Alexandra | 100% | 86% | 48% | 12% | 1% | |
16 | WEN Ethan | 100% | 97% | 75% | 32% | 6% | - |
17 | ACKLAND Matthew | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - |
18 | DAVIS Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | 12% | |
19 | VISCONTI Andrew | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% | - |
20 | GAO Xiaojiang "George" | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
21 | WAHIDY Mikail | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 12% |
22 | WINSLOW Michael | 100% | 28% | 2% | - | - | |
23 | SZILASI William | 100% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - |
24 | SZILASI Bill | 100% | 90% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - |
25 | LIBERTUCCI Gavin | 100% | 84% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - |
26 | KEENER Gerald | 100% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - |
27 | BASRALIAN Azniv | 100% | 79% | 34% | 5% | - | |
28 | VENUGOPAL Varun | 100% | 85% | 15% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.