Magic City SYC/RJCC & Y8

Youth 14 Men’s Foil (Y14MF)

Friday, April 12, 2024 at 8:00 AM

Register

Birmingham Jefferson Convention Complex - Birmingham, AL

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2704 2732 - 2682
5 - 8 2589 2642 - 2463
9 - 16 2364 2458 - 2277
17 - 32 2036 2255 - 1803
33 - 58 1596 1921 - 1028

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Guth, Joseph Cleveland Fencing Academy East LLC C24 2732 2473.61
2 Parrish, Evan AIC Fencing Club C24 2713 2461.96
3 sheng, Dalton AIC Fencing Club C24 2691 2436.85
4 Doell, Ethan Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. C24 2682 2428.34
5 Tang, Alexander OnTarget Fencing Club C24 2642 2390.12
6 Mazaheri, Fletcher Bluegrass Fencers' Club D24 2629 2375.05
7 Raj, Jay Space City Fencing Academy C23 2621 2362.95
8 Vaden, Oliver Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. C24 2463 2205.46
9 Yoon, Junhyeok Auburn Fencing Club C24 2458 2197.68
10 Zhao, Adam Birmingham Fencing Club B24 2423 2169.31
11 Zhao, Nathan Bluegrass Fencers' Club D24 2409 2153.64
12 Fedeli, Francesco Epic Fencing Club C22 2406 2148.91
13 LIM, EUNSEONG Auburn Fencing Club U 2376 2113.47
14 Wang, Elijah (QiChen) LA International Fencing U 2277 2022.19
15 Parker, Isaiah Salle De Long Fencers C24 2279 2021.38
16 Boeskin, Nolan Space City Fencing Academy C23 2283 2012.74
17 Ge, Felix Fei Renaissance Fencing Club U 2255 2000.99
18 Pan, Ethan Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. D24 2207 1955.74
19 Park, Andrew Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 2198 1944.39
20 Chang, Parker Fencers Club Inc. U 2167 1916.18
21 Fang, Haoyu Renaissance Fencing Club E24 2141 1888.24
22 Liu, Alex AIC Fencing Club U 2137 1881.19
23 Huynh, Matthew Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. E24 2104 1853.10
24 Marisi, Gabriel Lang Fencing Academy C24 2049 1794.38
25 Xu, Nathan Moe Fencing Club LLC E23 2029 1779.60
26 Dhokte, Neev Epic Fencing Club E24 1991 1732.76
27 Kim, Gene Austin Fencers Club U 1955 1642.34
28 LaTorre, Leonardo Renaissance Fencing Club E23 1898 1635.94
29 Martire, Luca Manhattan Fencing Center E24 1869 1608.08
30 Susanto, William Unattached U 1887 1574.68
31 You, Chanmin Lotus Fencing Academy U 1878 1557.83
32 Slain, Owen Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1803 1550.34
33 Jin, Xuechong Daniel Space City Fencing Academy U 1809 1547.12
34 Johnson, Soren Memphis University School Fencing Team D24 1868 1514.26
35 Zeng, Albert Bluegrass Fencers' Club U 1752 1494.37
36 Qian, Zekai Gold Fencing Club U 1741 1484.83
37 Mazaheri, John Bluegrass Fencers' Club U 1732 1474.08
38 Shaw, Spencer Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. E23 1734 1473.14
39 Cao, Kellen Lotus Fencing Academy E24 1798 1469.32
40 Li, Jayden Star Fencing Academy U 1734 1448.58
41 Lee, Junehyuk Auburn Fencing Club U 1692 1345.06
42 Karlekar, Ved Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1676 1342.80
43 Barrera, Marcelo Miami Lakes Fencing Club U 1817 1204.09
44 Chiang, Aiden Space City Fencing Academy U 1496 1202.37
45 Kim, Andrew Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 1490 1178.57
46 Grigoryan, Erik Masters Fencing Club U 1635 1163.85
47 Gogoi, Kavi Renaissance Fencing Club U 1421 1108.74
48 Robertson, Liam Birmingham Fencing Club U 1345 935.43
49 Lee, Aeden Brooklyn Bridge Fencing Club U 1224 879.67
50 Rebner, Parker Williamson County Fencing Club U 1418 864.75
51 Su, Daniel Birmingham Fencing Club E23 1415 743.41
52 Siggins, Wally Foothills Fencing Academy U 1304 637.30
53 Patel, Aarav Birmingham Fencing Club U 1063 194.96
54 Chiu, Vincent Birmingham Fencing Club U 1028 179.40
55 Martin, Julian Oxford Park U 1921 39.72
56 Pfrenger, Sebastian Oxford Park U 1890 23.90
57 Drake, Davis Birmingham Fencing Club U 1781 < 0
58 Martin, Sullivan Oxford Park U 1709 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!