Miami University - Oxford, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
1 | BUERGENTHAL Aaron P. | - | - | - | 9% | 90% |
2 | STEVENS Jeffrey | 3% | 29% | 47% | 19% | 1% |
3 | BLAKEMAN Michael J. | - | 3% | 27% | 48% | 22% |
3 | BALBUS Glenn H. | - | - | 2% | 25% | 73% |
5 | FARIDI Imran | 20% | 49% | 28% | 4% | - |
6 | SHULL Brandon | - | 4% | 24% | 45% | 27% |
7 | KANUK Jacob | 28% | 51% | 19% | 2% | - |
8 | CHAN Matthew | 1% | 17% | 44% | 33% | 5% |
9 | FIRMIN David P. | 3% | 25% | 46% | 25% | 1% |
10 | KELLY Olivia | 62% | 32% | 5% | - | - |
11 | JAMES John | 10% | 35% | 40% | 15% | - |
12 | SECREST Elizabeth | 9% | 41% | 40% | 9% | 1% |
13 | WALLER London | 11% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
14 | SNYDER Ryan | 16% | 40% | 34% | 10% | - |
15 | CHURA Annika S. | 6% | 32% | 43% | 18% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.