DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HRAPSKY Ryan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 19% | |
2 | HANSEN Lars | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 22% | |
3 | RANES Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 12% | |
3 | CARTER Austin L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% | 27% | 4% | |
5 | RICHARDS Dick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 26% |
6 | WOZNIAK Fryderyk | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
7 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 38% | |
8 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
9 | ANDERSON Brendan P. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 27% | 4% | |
10 | ANDREWS Iain | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 23% | 3% |
11 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 12% | |
12 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% | |
13 | AYMETT Robert (Skip) S. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 3% | |
14 | WRIGHT Ezra B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% | |
15 | RUSKIN David I. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 2% | |
16 | SAKO Ayrton I. | 100% | 99% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
17 | DESAMOURS Georges H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 69% | 26% | 3% | |
18 | DAVIS Jessica L. | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | |
19 | DIVERIS Joseph | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
20 | SINFUEGO Adrian | 100% | 84% | 22% | 2% | - | - | |
21 | BLACK Ethan | 100% | 27% | 2% | - | - | - | |
22 | BANNEN Nicholas | 100% | 92% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
23 | ZELINSKI A B. | 100% | 89% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | |
24 | SMITH Auynha | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
25 | VADDE Pranav | 100% | 85% | 52% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.