Event Results
Binghamton University March Math Match Invit.Difficulty Map
Each box shows how difficult an opponent was from the fencer's point of view.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KOLKER Gregory | V | V V | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 2 | CHEN Jason Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | JOSEPH Willem | V V V | V | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 4 | CRAMER Jo | V D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 5 | CHEN Zeyu Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 6 | CERCHIA Dominic | V D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 7 | INTRIAGO Erick | D | V D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 8 | CRUVER Luke Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 9 | GOLAND Ashley | V V | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 | |
| 10 | BETHANCOURT Allen | D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 11 | STEINMAN Keith Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 12 | JIN Alan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 13 | MANNIX Sean Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 14 | BERNSTEIN Aaron | D D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 | |
| 15 | KOUZNETSKI Tais | D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 16 | JAMISON Nathaniel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| Color | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |