Belleville High School - Belleville, MI, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | BECKER Thomas | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
| 2 | SCHULTZ Alex | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 3 | STEIBER Zane T. | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 3 | VISURAKAPALLI Sathvik | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 6 | MCDONNELL Michael | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
| 7 | GLASS Timothy C. | V V V D V D | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 8 | MARTIN Liam N. | D V D D V D | V V V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 9 | OH Kevin Y. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
| 10 | KLINE R. Jay | D V V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 11 | PENA Elijah N. | V D V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 12 | SEMIKIN Julia | V V V V D V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 13 | HAYENGA Gary M. | V V V D V D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 14 | SHAH S Ayush | V V D V V D | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 15 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | V D V V D V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 16 | KAROLAK Dale W. | V D V D D V | V V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
| 17 | ANA Ionut (Johnny) A. | V V V V V V | D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
| 18 | LEIGHTON Eleanor T. | V V D D V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 19 | VANDERLINDEN Brian | V D V V D V | D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 20 | BENYOVSZKY Barnabas | V D V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 21 | SCHRANK Mitchell | V D D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 22 | BROWN Amanda | D V D V V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 23 | CACCAMO Nicholas | D V D V D V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 24 | GOODMAN Zachary | D V V V D D | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 25 | DALTON Matthew | V D V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 26 | KWOK Roland | V D D D V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 27 | VANDERLINDEN Mira | V V D D D V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 28 | CHANG Aubin J. | D V V D V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 29 | RATNER Benjamin A. | V D V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 30 | DU Drake | D V D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 31 | PROVANCE Allison N. | D V D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 32 | ROZICH Ian M. | D V V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 33 | LEIGHTON Louise N. | D D D V V V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 34 | PROVANCE Amanda R. | D V V D V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 35 | GREEN Zachary J. | V D D V D V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 36 | OWENS Andrew J. | D D V D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 37 | SCHULTZ Gillian | D D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 38 | SCHULTZ Michelle M. | D V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 39 | ALARIE James | D D D V D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 40 | MIESMER Nicholas | V D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 41 | HOORNSTRA David | D D D D V D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 42 | OJE Chuku | D D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 43 | DRAYTON Hannah | D D D D V D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 45 | MITKUS Marianne J. | D D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 46 | BUTLER John | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 47 | GREEN Scott D. | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 48 | GRIFFIN Martha A. | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 49 | JAMES Erin | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.