Belleville High School - Belleville, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BECKER Thomas | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
2 | SCHULTZ Alex | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
3 | STEIBER Zane T. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 44% | 21% |
3 | VISURAKAPALLI Sathvik | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
6 | MCDONNELL Michael | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
7 | GLASS Timothy C. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
8 | MARTIN Liam N. | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
9 | OH Kevin Y. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
10 | KLINE R. Jay | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
11 | PENA Elijah N. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
12 | SEMIKIN Julia | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
13 | HAYENGA Gary M. | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
14 | SHAH S Ayush | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 2% |
15 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
16 | KAROLAK Dale W. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
17 | ANA Ionut (Johnny) A. | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 2% |
18 | LEIGHTON Eleanor T. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
19 | VANDERLINDEN Brian | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% |
20 | BENYOVSZKY Barnabas | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
21 | SCHRANK Mitchell | 1% | 8% | 23% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
22 | BROWN Amanda | 1% | 11% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
23 | CACCAMO Nicholas | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
24 | GOODMAN Zachary | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
25 | DALTON Matthew | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
26 | KWOK Roland | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
27 | VANDERLINDEN Mira | 1% | 5% | 18% | 30% | 29% | 14% | 3% |
28 | CHANG Aubin J. | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
29 | RATNER Benjamin A. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
30 | DU Drake | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
31 | PROVANCE Allison N. | 1% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - |
32 | ROZICH Ian M. | 3% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
33 | LEIGHTON Louise N. | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
34 | PROVANCE Amanda R. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
35 | GREEN Zachary J. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
36 | OWENS Andrew J. | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
37 | SCHULTZ Gillian | 10% | 29% | 33% | 20% | 7% | 1% | - |
38 | SCHULTZ Michelle M. | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
39 | ALARIE James | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
40 | MIESMER Nicholas | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 16% | 4% | - |
41 | HOORNSTRA David | 6% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
42 | OJE Chuku | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
43 | DRAYTON Hannah | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
45 | MITKUS Marianne J. | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
46 | BUTLER John | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
47 | GREEN Scott D. | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
48 | GRIFFIN Martha A. | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
49 | JAMES Erin | 17% | 36% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.