Internatonal Fencers Alliance of Dallas (IFAD) - Carrollton, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SEEFELDT William Henry C. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 44% | 33% | |
2 | ODEN Isaac M. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
3 | NEAL John P. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
3 | IMREK Elijah S. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
5 | BUHEIS Alexander I. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 33% | 39% | 13% |
6 | KHANNA Nikhil | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
7 | ROMANOV Ethan | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
8 | BARG Jonathan | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
9 | JONES Bennett | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
10 | ZHU Eric | - | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
11 | MCALISTER Ian | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
12 | ESKRIDGE Caleb | 1% | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
13 | RUNGE Patrick A. | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
14 | CHIN Dylan A. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
15 | PHAM Sawyer T. | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 11% | |
16 | MUGA Aiden | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
17 | GAITHER Christopher W. | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
18 | GOMEZ Chase S. | 1% | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
19 | HESSE Hans | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
20 | AYALA Nayen L. | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
21 | JIANG Raymond | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
22 | SEBASTIAN Alexander P. | 5% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | - | |
23 | KOLLARS Jacob | 38% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
24 | ESHONKULOV Aziz | 20% | 46% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
25 | HOWARD Josiah | 31% | 41% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
26 | SANCHEZ Emanuel | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
27 | VAN VACTER Thomas | 41% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.