Fredericksburg Expo & Conference Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SENIC Adeline | - | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 83% |
| 2 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
| 3 | LEE Lavender | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
| 3 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
| 5 | YURKOVA Mariia | - | - | 4% | 17% | 38% | 36% | 6% |
| 6 | MI Aileen | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 46% | 39% |
| 7 | BIODROWICZ Julia | - | - | 2% | 16% | 50% | 32% | |
| 8 | KIM Rachel | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 15% | 1% |
| 9 | CHEN Renee | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 28% | 4% |
| 10 | FEDELI Caterina S. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 67% |
| 11 | CASCONE Emily | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 49% | 31% |
| 12 | WU Celine | - | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% |
| 13 | LIN Zhi tong | - | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 14 | XIE Lillian | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 15 | CALISE Ella | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 16 | PAULUS Sloane | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 17 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% |
| 18 | LI Sophia M. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 46% | 39% | |
| 19 | YANG Lingting | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 3% |
| 20 | KUMAMOTO Shino | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 21 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
| 22 | MCSHERRY Ava | - | 2% | 12% | 27% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
| 23 | DENG Melissa | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 24 | TUCKER ALARCON Frida | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 25 | HU Felice | 3% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 26 | KAPRAN Anastasia | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 27 | LI Eleanor | 10% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 28 | KAPUSTINA Arina | - | - | 3% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 7% |
| 29 | LEE emily | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 30 | PARK Lina | - | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | SHIM Grace | - | - | 2% | 12% | 37% | 44% | 5% |
| 32 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 33 | PAULUS Isabella | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 34 | PEVZNER Nicole | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 35 | LIAW Elaine | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 36 | YU Jane | 13% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 38 | FENG Grace | 1% | 11% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 39 | BROWN Lola | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 39 | BASILE Gianna | 10% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | VIANA Reese | 3% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 42 | OWENS Elise | 8% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 43 | JOO Natalie | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 44 | WEI Angela | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% | - |
| 45 | CAO Kayla | 29% | 48% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 46 | SUNMAN Rory | 47% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 47 | MAJID Inaaya | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | VIJAYAKUMAR Diya | 8% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 49 | GAO Anne | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 50 | ALLEYNE Taylar | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 51 | TEPMAN Alexandra D. | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | CHOI Hannah | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 53 | ARMSTRONG Olivia | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | WRIGHT Taliyah | 1% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 55 | LEE Alice | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | WANG CAROL | 39% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 57 | DESERANNO Seren | 6% | 30% | 45% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 58 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | 2% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 59 | WRIGHT Trinity | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | TAN Isabella | 32% | 48% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 61 | LICHTENSTEIGER Megan | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 62 | HWANG Chanel | 63% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.