Fredericksburg Expo & Conference Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MEHAN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% |
2 | PATEL Rayn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
3 | LIU Victor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% |
3 | WANG Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 9% |
5 | VAID Luke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 20% |
6 | KIM Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% |
7 | SO Preston | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 21% | |
8 | WANG daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 36% |
9 | WANG Max | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% | |
10 | BREUER Daniel | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | < 1% |
11 | CLARK Aram | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
12 | DAI Zihou | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
13 | GUREVICH Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
14 | ZHAO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% |
15 | NG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 6% | |
16 | LIN Philip T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
17 | YU BOWEN | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
18 | HALL Noah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 14% | |
19 | NARDINI Nathanael P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 8% |
20 | CHUNG Connor | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
21 | TURECK Nathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
22 | PINTO Marcus | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
23 | CHAMBERS Miles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 32% | 3% |
24 | HU Andrew | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
25 | OH Aster | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | 22% | |
26 | WAGNER Joseph | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
27 | NGO Maximus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | 1% |
28 | ANAND Rishab | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 12% | 1% |
29 | ZHAO David | 100% | 97% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
29 | HARDRICK Noah | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
31 | HUCHWAJDA Alex | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% | |
32 | SOKOLOV Arseniy | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - |
33 | CHANG Timothy | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
34 | FENG Brendan | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
35 | BAI Evan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
36 | PINKNEY Derek A. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
37 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 87% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | |
38 | LIU Aaron | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 5% | - |
39 | JANSEN Noah | 100% | 88% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
40 | PORTER Dupree | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
41 | CAI fungyu | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
41 | CARD Seamus | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
43 | HU Harry | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
44 | FEI Danny | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
45 | YANG Justin | 100% | 81% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
46 | WEI Rian | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
47 | MELUL Jonathan | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | |
47 | RINALDI Savio | 100% | 52% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
49 | NGO Emerson | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
50 | MEHTA Yash | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
51 | LIAO Sirui | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
52 | CHEN Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
53 | THEUNISSE Oliver | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
54 | BADMUS Joshua | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
55 | CHAWLA Abhishek | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
56 | VALENCIA Jose | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
57 | MCERLEAN Kellen | 100% | 98% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | |
58 | GRABOWSKI Stanley | 100% | 44% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
59 | LEE Ezra | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
60 | AVERY Marcus | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
61 | CHAVAN Aditya | 100% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.