Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 2 | SHIN Joshua J. | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
| 3 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | V V V V D D | V V V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 3 | LI Arvin | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 5 | DAVIDSON Elliot | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 6 | WU Michael | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 7 | MIALL Steven A. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 8 | WANG Mason | V V D V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 9 | HOWARD Michael | V V V V V V | V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 10 | ZHAO Jesse | V D V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 11 | MILLER Aidan A. | V V V D V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 12 | ALIMI Yacine A. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 13 | LI Ayren | D V V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 14 | BOUTIN Nathaniel J. | V V D D V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 15 | BOOTHMAN Colby | V D D V D V | V V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 16 | XU Ethan | D V V D V D | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 17 | LIGH Thomas | V V V D V V | D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 18 | BUCKLEY-JONES Henry C. | V V V D V V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 19 | HOLCOMB Cedric | V V V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 20 | BENTLEY Nick | V V V D V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 21 | WILSON Samuel S. | V V D D V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 22 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | D D V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 23 | SHAO Eric | D D V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 24 | MCQUIDE Elliot | D V D V D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 25 | MENG Zhaoyi | D V V D D V | V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
| 26 | KONG Luculentus X. | D V D V V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 27 | BOUSSY Luciano | D V V D D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 28 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | V V V D D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 29 | EBERMAN Henry | D D V V V D | V D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 30 | LACHAPELLE Cole | V D D V D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 31 | ZHENG Harrison | D D V D V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 32 | ABRUZZESE Owen | D V D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 33 | GARDINER Luke J. | D V D D V V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 34 | ZHAO Brandon | D D D V D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 35 | HAZLETT Grady | D D D V V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 36 | VO Jonathan | V V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 37 | DALOMBA Kingston | V D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 38 | SOLOPOULOS James | D D V V D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 39 | BERGERON Justin | D V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 40 | TIBBETTS Justin | D D D V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 41 | FENG Michael | D V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 42 | BROGAN Kevin | D D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 43 | CUTLER Thomas Scott | D D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 44 | WANG Qiqi | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 44 | DANGELO Connor | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 46 | KIMBALL Curtis | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 47 | HILL David E. | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 47 | SHALES Henry Amos | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 47 | STAFFORD Gareth | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.