Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 21% | 78% |
| 2 | SHIN Joshua J. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 31% | 63% |
| 3 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
| 3 | LI Arvin | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% |
| 5 | DAVIDSON Elliot | - | - | 2% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 7% |
| 6 | WU Michael | - | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% |
| 7 | MIALL Steven A. | - | - | - | 4% | 24% | 46% | 25% |
| 8 | WANG Mason | - | - | - | 3% | 21% | 50% | 25% |
| 9 | HOWARD Michael | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 43% | 46% |
| 10 | ZHAO Jesse | - | - | 1% | 12% | 46% | 36% | 5% |
| 11 | MILLER Aidan A. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 9% |
| 12 | ALIMI Yacine A. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 15% |
| 13 | LI Ayren | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
| 14 | BOUTIN Nathaniel J. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% |
| 15 | BOOTHMAN Colby | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
| 16 | XU Ethan | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | LIGH Thomas | - | - | 2% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 8% |
| 18 | BUCKLEY-JONES Henry C. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 4% |
| 19 | HOLCOMB Cedric | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 28% | 4% | - |
| 20 | BENTLEY Nick | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 21 | WILSON Samuel S. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 22 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | - | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 11% |
| 23 | SHAO Eric | - | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% |
| 24 | MCQUIDE Elliot | 3% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 25 | MENG Zhaoyi | - | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 16% |
| 26 | KONG Luculentus X. | - | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 27 | BOUSSY Luciano | - | 2% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | - | 4% | 25% | 42% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 29 | EBERMAN Henry | 18% | 43% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | LACHAPELLE Cole | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 31 | ZHENG Harrison | 1% | 11% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 32 | ABRUZZESE Owen | 5% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 33 | GARDINER Luke J. | 16% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | ZHAO Brandon | 7% | 44% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | HAZLETT Grady | 14% | 49% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | VO Jonathan | 33% | 47% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 37 | DALOMBA Kingston | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 38 | SOLOPOULOS James | 23% | 43% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | BERGERON Justin | 4% | 38% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | TIBBETTS Justin | 25% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 41 | FENG Michael | 14% | 43% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | BROGAN Kevin | 2% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 43 | CUTLER Thomas Scott | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 44 | WANG Qiqi | 6% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | DANGELO Connor | 56% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 46 | KIMBALL Curtis | 50% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 47 | HILL David E. | 10% | 38% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | SHALES Henry Amos | 4% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 47 | STAFFORD Gareth | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.