DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | JAKEL Sophia N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 36% |
2 | SWEET Ryleigh E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 8% | |
3 | MORGAN Elizabeth (Ella) R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
3 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 12% |
5 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 9% | |
6 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
7 | UPHAM Karolyn | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 4% | |
8 | ZHU Serene M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 10% | |
9 | KUDIEROVA Anastasiia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 37% |
10 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% |
11 | JAKEL Alysa C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 29% | 4% |
12 | MURPHY Megan | 100% | 93% | 61% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
13 | ASHER Valerie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | |
14 | BRISK Angelica A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 27% | 4% | |
15 | GORDET Cristina G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 31% | |
16 | POWERS Meredith R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 11% | 1% |
17 | SIBLEY Elisabeth J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 9% | |
18 | LIU Nicole | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | |
19 | KISH Christina | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
20 | MACE Eliza M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
21 | MORET Brighid E. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
22 | AFFELTRANGER Yixuan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
23 | BOWIE Charlotta | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 21% | 2% | - |
24 | VICKERMAN Lilly | 100% | 96% | 64% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
25 | JEANDHEUR Carole A. | 100% | 92% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - | |
26 | UNGURIANU Nika | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
27 | MITCHELL Erica | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
28 | VICKERMAN Sofia | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
29 | BRASTED Karen (Maggie) E. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
30 | MAGALSKI Mary | 100% | 96% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | |
31 | BYRON Karen J. | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
32 | RIST Rebecca (Beck) J. | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
33 | VICKERMAN Aspen | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
34 | NATSIOS Emily F. | 100% | 98% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
35 | JOHNSON Merit | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
36 | GIFFORD Sally | 100% | 84% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | |
37 | RASMUSSEN Annika | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | |
38 | MARTIN Audrey | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
39 | HORNER Abby | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.