Tileston Gym - Wilmington, NC, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CLICK Aiden | V V V V V | V V V V V | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 2 | CHEN Wesley | V V D V | V V V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 3 | SLOUGH Sean | D D V V V | V V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 3 | ROSE Ben | D V V V | V V V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 5 | THOMAS Jr. Robert D. | V V V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 6 | KMIEC Stephen M. | V V D V | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 7 | SHEPARD Seth | D V D V V | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 8 | GRANT Newton | D V D V | V V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 9 | AMOROSO John | V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 10 | GALBRAITH Oliver S. | V V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 11 | HARVEY Jesse D. | V V D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 12 | MONES Robert (Bob) J. | V V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 13 | SANFORD Kenyatta L. | D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 14 | ALEXANDER Amelia | V D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 15 | BUCCELLATO Joel S. | D D V D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 16 | SANDERS Cole | D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 17 | MILEWSKI Nicole | D V V V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 18 | CRAWFORD Charles (Marston) M. | D V V V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 19 | PAPPAS Brian | V D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 20 | PLAZA-GASALLA Gloria | D V D V V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 21 | MCCORMICK Connor D. | V V D V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 22 | LOUGHLIN Ariana | D V V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 23 | NANCE Jonathan W. | V D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 24 | NIEMAN Brent A. | V D V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 24 | SREEDHARA Aneesh | V D D V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 26 | HARRIS Lynn B. | D V V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 27 | HAMERSKI Clayton J. | V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 28 | HUANG Stephanie A. | D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 28 | SIERS David M. | D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 30 | GOLDER Christiane | D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 31 | JULIEN Erica | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 32 | SCHEER Kate | D D D D | V D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 33 | BURDOO Nora | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.