Charlotte, NC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XUE Alanna L. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
| 2 | FERNANDES Thea | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 10% | |
| 3 | ROY Layla | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
| 3 | MEI Sarah | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 5 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 6 | BRADFORD Meeah | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
| 7 | WU Irene M. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
| 8 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
| 9 | LUO Sandra J. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% |
| 10 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% |
| 11 | LI Shuang | - | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
| 12 | CANNON Lira J. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 13 | LI Sophia M. | - | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 14 | MI Aileen | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 15 | ZHENG Julie | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% |
| 16 | LONG Madeline M. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 23% | |
| 18 | CHOW Annabelle | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 19 | HUANG NATALIE | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
| 20 | KOSTELNY Alexis | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 21 | XIANG Emma | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% | |
| 22 | LEE Ji Ahn | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 23 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | - | - | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% | |
| 24 | DU Hannah | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 25 | KOROL Dana | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
| 26 | HOBSON Ava | - | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 27 | ZHANG Eunice | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 28 | NIKOLIC Alexandra | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 29 | WEBB Ella | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 30 | MI Anning | - | 4% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 6% | |
| 31 | YE Eileen | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 29% | |
| 32 | POWERS Meredith R. | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 33 | TAN Clarisse | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
| 34 | WU Julianna Y. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 21% |
| 35 | DRAGNE Alexis D. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% |
| 36 | QIAN Zhiyan | - | 7% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 37 | WONG Sophia M. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% |
| 38 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 39 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 43% | 19% | |
| 40 | SLASKI Caroline O. | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 41 | LIN Ju-An Adrianne | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
| 42 | WANG Jasmine | - | 5% | 24% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 43 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
| 44 | BOLES Amanda X. | 2% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 45 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 5% | 26% | 42% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 46 | GANDLURI Sreehitha (Sarah) | 37% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 47 | SHENG Chuxi | - | 4% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 6% | |
| 48 | MADDOX Lacey E. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 49 | KETTELLE Molly | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 50 | TOLBERT Zoe | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 21% |
| 51 | COOPER Piper W. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 52 | KANG Jiyoon | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 53 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 54 | RICHARDS Ella | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | RASO Olivia | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 56 | LUO ZIWEN | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
| 57 | SHA Yi Ling | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 58 | DATLA Medha | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 59 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | - | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 60 | LIN Victoria T. | 2% | 21% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 61 | MEYER Claudia | 5% | 43% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 62 | PARK Leah | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 63 | KO Claire | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | |
| 64 | BAWA Sahana | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 65 | BASSIK Eva | 1% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 66 | JIANG Claire | 4% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 67 | WANG Celine S. | 13% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 68 | ZHENG Zoe | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 69 | GAO Anna | 14% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 70 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 16% | 41% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 71 | FULIGNI Isabella | 22% | 43% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 37% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 73 | ROHRING Anna | 17% | 51% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | WU Velyn | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 75 | KUNDU TRISHA | 19% | 50% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 76 | SA Milla | 26% | 44% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 77 | HERNANDEZ Veronica L. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 78 | YANICELLI Sloane | 17% | 44% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 79 | ROMANO Megan C. | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 80 | LUH Mia P. | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 81 | EUH Jayme | 53% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 82 | WATERS Samantha M. | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 83 | DONG Emily | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 84 | DHULIPALA Aparna | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 85 | SHAH Suhani | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 86 | SPECTOR Eliana | 54% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 86 | HE Katherine | 78% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.