Charlotte, NC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XUE Alanna L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
| 2 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 10% | |
| 3 | ROY Layla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 10% |
| 3 | MEI Sarah | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
| 5 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 13% |
| 6 | BRADFORD Meeah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
| 7 | WU Irene M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 7% |
| 8 | SEO IRENE Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% |
| 9 | LUO Sandra J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 17% |
| 10 | CHEN Chloe I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% |
| 11 | LI Shuang | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 6% |
| 12 | CANNON Lira J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 13 | LI Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 4% | |
| 14 | MI Aileen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
| 15 | ZHENG Julie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% |
| 16 | LONG Madeline M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 23% | |
| 18 | CHOW Annabelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
| 19 | HUANG NATALIE | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 46% | 12% |
| 20 | KOSTELNY Alexis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
| 21 | XIANG Emma | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% | |
| 22 | LEE Ji Ahn | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 23 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 26% | |
| 24 | DU Hannah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 25 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
| 26 | HOBSON Ava | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 27 | ZHANG Eunice | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 28 | NIKOLIC Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 29 | WEBB Ella | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 30 | MI Anning | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 6% | |
| 31 | YE Eileen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% | |
| 32 | POWERS Meredith R. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 33 | TAN Clarisse | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 11% |
| 34 | WU Julianna Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% |
| 35 | DRAGNE Alexis D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% |
| 36 | QIAN Zhiyan | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 37 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 12% |
| 38 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 39 | LIU Angel(Daying) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 19% | |
| 40 | SLASKI Caroline O. | 100% | 93% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 41 | LIN Ju-An Adrianne | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 5% |
| 42 | WANG Jasmine | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 43 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% |
| 44 | BOLES Amanda X. | 100% | 98% | 78% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 45 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 100% | 95% | 69% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 46 | GANDLURI Sreehitha (Sarah) | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 47 | SHENG Chuxi | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% | 6% | |
| 48 | MADDOX Lacey E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 49 | KETTELLE Molly | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 50 | TOLBERT Zoe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% |
| 51 | COOPER Piper W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 4% |
| 52 | KANG Jiyoon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 53 | SIMONOV Dasha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% |
| 54 | RICHARDS Ella | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | RASO Olivia | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
| 56 | LUO ZIWEN | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% | |
| 57 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
| 58 | DATLA Medha | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 59 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 60 | LIN Victoria T. | 100% | 98% | 76% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 61 | MEYER Claudia | 100% | 95% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 62 | PARK Leah | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 63 | KO Claire | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 64 | BAWA Sahana | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 65 | BASSIK Eva | 100% | 99% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 66 | JIANG Claire | 100% | 96% | 66% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 67 | WANG Celine S. | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 68 | ZHENG Zoe | 100% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 69 | GAO Anna | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 70 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 100% | 84% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 71 | FULIGNI Isabella | 100% | 78% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 73 | ROHRING Anna | 100% | 83% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | WU Velyn | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 75 | KUNDU TRISHA | 100% | 81% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 76 | SA Milla | 100% | 74% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 77 | HERNANDEZ Veronica L. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 78 | YANICELLI Sloane | 100% | 83% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 79 | ROMANO Megan C. | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 80 | LUH Mia P. | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 81 | EUH Jayme | 100% | 47% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 82 | WATERS Samantha M. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 83 | DONG Emily | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 84 | DHULIPALA Aparna | 100% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 85 | SHAH Suhani | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 86 | SPECTOR Eliana | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 86 | HE Katherine | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.