Charlotte, NC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHON Taylor A. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% | |
2 | YUN Jaesun | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% | |
3 | ERMAKOV Lev | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 22% | |
3 | KIM Shaun M. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 23% |
5 | WANG Eric Y. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
6 | HOLZ William A. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
7 | BUCHMANN Finn D. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
8 | HJERPE Wade H. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 9% |
9 | CHAN Matthew | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
10 | CHOI Silas | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
11 | KOGAN Benjamin | - | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
12 | OH Triton | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
13 | ZUBATIY Samuel | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
14 | KIM Alexander M. | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
15 | MICLAUS Justin | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
16 | BERRIO Carter E. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% | |
17 | LIM William J. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
18 | LEE Aydan J. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
19 | PATIL Aaryan A. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
20 | ZHU Yuchen (Kevin) | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
21 | ATANASSOV Vasil V. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
22 | YUN Jake | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
23 | BYON Adrian | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
24 | HONG Steven | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
25 | LUTHRA Arjun | - | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
26 | PRIMUS Nazir | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
27 | LIN Daniel | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
28 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
29 | BAE Jason I. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
30 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
31 | KROON Lucas | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
32 | ZENG Noah | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% | |
33 | LEE Justin | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 19% | |
34 | LUO George F. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
35 | ZHENG Edward L. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
36 | CRAIG Samuel | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
37 | AVAKIAN Alec | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
38 | FENG Leo | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
39 | WOODWARD Connor | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
40 | XU Andrew | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
41 | MAKLIN Edward P. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% |
42 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% |
42 | DENG Andrew | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
42 | KUMAR Sachit | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
45 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 33% | 33% | 12% |
46 | JIANG Anthony | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 26% |
47 | HOLZ Daniel | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
48 | PANDEY Neil | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% | |
49 | SHOMAN Noah | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
50 | PENG Bryan | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
51 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
52 | LIU Lawrence | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
53 | GONZALEZ Emilio A. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% |
53 | KANG evan | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
55 | GAO Albert | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
56 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
57 | LEE Noah | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
58 | PAN Alex | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
59 | ZHANG Jeffrey | 1% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 2% | |
60 | STONE Esmond A. | - | 7% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
61 | CHEONG Heonjun | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
62 | NG Jeremiah | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
63 | ZHOU James Y. | 10% | 38% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
64 | BROU Inkosi | 5% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
65 | SHANKAR Karthik | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | < 1% | - |
66 | HUANG Ethan F. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% | |
67 | TAO Jeffrey | 1% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
68 | GLOZMAN Justin | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
69 | QIU Nathan | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
70 | SHAHZAD Azlan A. | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - |
71 | ZHANG Derek | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
72 | SMINK Oliver | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
73 | SINGH Angadh | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
74 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
75 | HU Christopher | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
76 | SHOMAN Zachary | - | - | 3% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
77 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
77 | CHTERENTAL Alex | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
79 | RAMANAN Govind | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
80 | MEHTA Krish | 2% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
81 | STURN Oliver | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% |
82 | JAIN Aniket | 29% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
83 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
84 | GINSBERG jordan | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
85 | LIN Steve | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
86 | THORNHILL Kwasi | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% | |
87 | GAO Marcus | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
88 | ROBINSON William | 5% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
89 | LEONARD Charles | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
90 | WANG Nicolas | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
91 | WANG Robert | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
92 | KILGALLEN William | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
93 | CHAN Aidan | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
93 | HOPPA Luke H. | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
93 | PATEL Rayn | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
96 | SU Landon | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
96 | DEPEW Spencer | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
98 | LUHAN Zachary | 15% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
99 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
100 | HAN Edward | 2% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
101 | WEBER Mattias A. | 7% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
101 | VELTZ Tyler J. | 48% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
103 | HUANG Connor | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
104 | SUGIURA Samuel | 3% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
105 | FIRSTMAN William B. | 33% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
106 | BOSITA Carson | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
107 | YANG Dylan | 1% | 13% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
107 | MOL Justin | 64% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
109 | PI Alexander | 7% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | |
110 | BYON Julian | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
111 | DEKA Tanush | 23% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
112 | BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
113 | FAYETTE Julien | 48% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
114 | MAY Griffin M. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
115 | BOUKHTIN Maxim | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
116 | KIM Minhyeok | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
117 | KESSLER Nathan | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
118 | CHEN Evan P. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 2% |
119 | VOSS Jeffer | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
120 | BERA Enzo | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
121 | GOLD Carter | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
122 | CHENG Hong | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
123 | HOUTZ Mitchell B. | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
124 | KUSHKOV Daniel | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
125 | SAVOY Luca | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
125 | TANG Charles | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
127 | DECK Tyson | 38% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
128 | TAUER Sam | 59% | 34% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
129 | ZHANG Ethan W. | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
130 | ATWOOD Griffin | 18% | 43% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
130 | ZHANG Yupeng | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
132 | SUN Ziyao | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
133 | OLARIO Raphael | 69% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
134 | FARIDI Imran | 65% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.