Charlotte, NC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Zoe | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 2 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 45% | |
| 3 | RUSSO Francesca | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
| 3 | MILLER Sky | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 10% |
| 5 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 6 | TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
| 7 | SHEALY Maggie | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 8 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 15% |
| 9 | LINDER Kara E. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 47% | |
| 10 | JOHNSON Lauren | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 11 | LEE Alexandra B. | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 11% |
| 12 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 11% |
| 13 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 40% | 28% |
| 14 | TONG Kunling | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 34% | 10% | |
| 15 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 37% | 10% | |
| 16 | POSSICK Lola P. | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 14% | |
| 17 | FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 70% |
| 18 | JENKINS Ryan J. | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
| 19 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
| 20 | OISHI Megumi | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 21 | HULSEBURG Kaitlyn | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 22 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 23 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 24 | SINGLETON-COMFORT Leanne | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
| 25 | KRASTEV Minna | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 2% | |
| 26 | ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
| 27 | SZETO Chloe | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 28 | JOHNSON Honor | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% |
| 29 | BOIS Adele | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | LIN Audrey J. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 32 | LU Vivian Y. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
| 33 | BURKE Nora S. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% |
| 33 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 35 | OLSEN Natalie J. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 1% |
| 36 | LI Victoria J. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 37 | BLUM Leah I. | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 38 | MIKA Veronica | - | 5% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 39 | SADIK HANA | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | CHANG Emily | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 41 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
| 42 | STONE Hava S. | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 43 | KOVACS Sophia | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 3% |
| 44 | CODY Alexandra C. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 45 | SAYLES Nina R. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 46 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 47 | LI Amanda C. | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 48 | PAK Kaitlyn | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 49 | TZOU Alexandra | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 50 | HARRILL Gillian N. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
| 51 | KONG Vera | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 52 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 53 | SUN Alyssa | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | CHANG Josephine S. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 55 | KER Grace | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 56 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 57 | WALTER Zsofia R. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 58 | CHIN Erika J. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
| 59 | ZEGERS Anneke E. | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 10% | |
| 60 | FANG Victoria W. | 6% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 61 | XI Shining | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 62 | LEE Hannah | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 63 | BILILIES Sophia | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 65 | LIGH Erenei J. | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 66 | YANG Ashley M. | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 67 | NEWELL Alexia C. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 68 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 69 | DUCKETT Madison | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 70 | LACSON Sarah | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 71 | LU Elaine | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 72 | GHAYALOD reya | 9% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 73 | GHOSH Priyanka | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 74 | CHIN Sophia J. | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 75 | YANG Angelina LeLe | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 76 | YUAN Greta | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 77 | MENKE Kavya I. | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 78 | CAO Stephanie X. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 79 | MARSEE Samantha | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 80 | DANK Dina | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 81 | SHEARER Natalie E. | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 82 | JUNG Irene | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 83 | PAUL Lila | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 84 | HILD Nisha | 7% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 85 | SINHA Anika | 23% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 86 | LU Amy | 17% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 87 | GEYER Carolina M. | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 88 | YONG Erika E. | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
| 89 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% | |
| 90 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 91 | CHIANG Emily | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 92 | LIU Sophie | 8% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 93 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 93 | VESTEL Mira B. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 95 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 6% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 96 | SHI Cathleen | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 97 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 98 | PRIEUR Lauren | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 99 | MCKEE Brynnley | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 99 | NATH Trisha | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 101 | ENDO Miyuki N. | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 102 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 103 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 104 | HWANG Gabriela M. | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 104 | TAO Hannah J. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
| 106 | WEI Vivian W. | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 107 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 44% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.