Charlotte, NC, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | V V V V V | V V V V V V | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
2 | YANG Angelina LeLe | V V V V D | V V V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
3 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
3 | PAUL Lila | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
5 | FEARNS Zara A. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
6 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | V V V V D V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
7 | KYNETT Kathryn G. | V D V V | V V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
8 | WU Helen | V V D V D V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
9 | CHEN Ashley | V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
10 | SO Catelyn | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
11 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
12 | TONG Jessie | V V V V D | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
13 | FANG Sabrina | V D V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
14 | FESTA Carina | V V V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
15 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | V D D V | V V V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
16 | NAYAK Indra | V D V D D | V V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
17 | NGUYEN Siena | V D V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
18 | KANTIPUDI Shrika | V D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
19 | PALEO Gabriella | V D V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
19 | NGUYEN Ella | V V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
21 | CHIANG Emily | D V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
22 | LUKER Sophia | D V V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
23 | HURST Kennedy | V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
24 | XIKES Katherine E. | V D V V V D | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
25 | LIU Zhi Jun | D V V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
26 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | V D D V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
27 | LIGH Erenei J. | V V D D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
28 | CHEN Kevy | V V V D D | V V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
29 | NOVICK Mia J. | V D D V V | V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
30 | BARNOVITZ Maya | D V V D V | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
30 | LI Angela | V V V D D | V V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
32 | LIN Nicole | V D V V D D | V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
33 | DILLE Carolina G. | V V V V V D | D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
34 | ZHAO Emily W. | V V D V V V | D | 2.1 | 5 | +2.9 |
35 | YU Zhiang | V D V V V V | D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
36 | BAKER Audrey C. | V V D V D V | D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
37 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | D V V D V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
38 | LIM Jaslene | V D D V V V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
38 | YANG Lea | V V V D V D | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
40 | HUANG MADELINE | D V V D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
41 | DAI Olivia | V D V V D | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
42 | REN Xinling | V D D V V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
43 | SADOVA Olga | D V V V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
44 | MACE Eliza M. | V D V V D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
45 | TSUI Natalie | V D V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
46 | DENG Brooke | D V D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
47 | WANG Zidan | V V D V D D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
48 | KNIGHT Skylar | D D V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
49 | HE Lizbeth | D D V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
50 | MARYASH Samantha | V V D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
51 | LI Alexis | D V D V D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
52 | WU Lanting | D V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
53 | LIM Jovine | D V D V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
54 | COLTER Aurora | D V D V D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
55 | NAYAK Anika | D V D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
56 | JEAN Emmanuelle C. | V D D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
57 | PANIGRAHI Kingsley | D V D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
57 | LO JOCELYN | V D D D V D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
59 | FEIG Sela | D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
60 | LIAO Siwen | D V D D D | V D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
61 | NAYAK Esha | D D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
62 | CHAPMAN-LAYLAND Astrid M. | V D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
63 | LIN Sarah | V D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
64 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | D D D D D V | V D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
65 | HOLMES Emma | D D V V D V | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
66 | CHIN Elise | D V V V D D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
67 | JEAN Olympe G. | V V D D D V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
68 | SCOTT Eve | V D V V D D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
69 | JEONG Katie | V D D V V D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
70 | YAN Lena | D D D V V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
71 | LIU Sumin | D V D V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
72 | WUNNAVA Elina | D V D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
73 | YANG Jenny J. | D D V D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
74 | MONTORIO Lily M. | D D D V D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
75 | XU Emily T. | D D D D V V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
76 | MUELLER Amelia D. | D D V D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
77 | TRUBEY Elise | D D D V D V | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
78 | TUNG Renee | V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
79 | SCHIKORE Anna M. | D D V D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
80 | PANIGRAHI Emersen | D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
81 | MANN Sophia J. | D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
82 | NAYAK Mira | D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
83 | LI Victoria | D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
84 | ORLOFSKY Sydney | D D D D V | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
85 | GLUCK Myriam | D V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
86 | ROBINSON Emerald | D V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
87 | YAO Rainie | D V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
88 | YOUNG Audrey | D D D D D V | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
89 | SCHICK Veronica | D D D D V D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
90 | RANDALL Cathleen Coyle | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
91 | CHEN Yuhan (Daisy) | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
92 | TODD Phoebe | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
93 | ZHOU Ruoxi ( Jasmine) | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
94 | WUNNAVA Ellora | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.