Charlotte, NC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | |
| 2 | YANG Angelina LeLe | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 17% | |
| 3 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 55% |
| 3 | PAUL Lila | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
| 5 | FEARNS Zara A. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 39% | |
| 6 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 17% |
| 7 | KYNETT Kathryn G. | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% | ||
| 8 | WU Helen | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 9 | CHEN Ashley | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 17% | |
| 10 | SO Catelyn | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 11 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 12 | TONG Jessie | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 13 | FANG Sabrina | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 14 | FESTA Carina | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% | |
| 15 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 6% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | ||
| 16 | NAYAK Indra | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 17 | NGUYEN Siena | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 18 | KANTIPUDI Shrika | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 8% | |
| 19 | PALEO Gabriella | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
| 19 | NGUYEN Ella | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 21 | CHIANG Emily | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
| 22 | LUKER Sophia | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | ||
| 23 | HURST Kennedy | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 22% | ||
| 24 | XIKES Katherine E. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 25 | LIU Zhi Jun | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 26 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
| 27 | LIGH Erenei J. | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 28 | CHEN Kevy | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 29 | NOVICK Mia J. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
| 30 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 30 | LI Angela | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | LIN Nicole | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 5% | - |
| 33 | DILLE Carolina G. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 34 | ZHAO Emily W. | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 35 | YU Zhiang | 2% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 36 | BAKER Audrey C. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 40% | 23% |
| 37 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 38 | LIM Jaslene | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 38 | YANG Lea | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 40 | HUANG MADELINE | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 41 | DAI Olivia | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | REN Xinling | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 43 | SADOVA Olga | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 44 | MACE Eliza M. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% | |
| 45 | TSUI Natalie | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 8% | ||
| 46 | DENG Brooke | 9% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 2% | ||
| 47 | WANG Zidan | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 48 | KNIGHT Skylar | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 49 | HE Lizbeth | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 50 | MARYASH Samantha | 7% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 3% | ||
| 51 | LI Alexis | 13% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | WU Lanting | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 53 | LIM Jovine | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
| 54 | COLTER Aurora | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 55 | NAYAK Anika | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 56 | JEAN Emmanuelle C. | 9% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 57 | PANIGRAHI Kingsley | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 57 | LO JOCELYN | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 59 | FEIG Sela | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 3% | ||
| 60 | LIAO Siwen | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% | |
| 61 | NAYAK Esha | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
| 62 | CHAPMAN-LAYLAND Astrid M. | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 63 | LIN Sarah | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 64 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | - | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 65 | HOLMES Emma | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 66 | CHIN Elise | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 67 | JEAN Olympe G. | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 68 | SCOTT Eve | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 69 | JEONG Katie | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 70 | YAN Lena | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 71 | LIU Sumin | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
| 72 | WUNNAVA Elina | 11% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 73 | YANG Jenny J. | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
| 74 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 75 | XU Emily T. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 76 | MUELLER Amelia D. | 6% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 77 | TRUBEY Elise | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 78 | TUNG Renee | 28% | 43% | 23% | 6% | - | ||
| 79 | SCHIKORE Anna M. | 31% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | ||
| 80 | PANIGRAHI Emersen | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 81 | MANN Sophia J. | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | - | |
| 82 | NAYAK Mira | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 83 | LI Victoria | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 84 | ORLOFSKY Sydney | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
| 85 | GLUCK Myriam | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 86 | ROBINSON Emerald | 25% | 40% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 87 | YAO Rainie | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 88 | YOUNG Audrey | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 89 | SCHICK Veronica | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 90 | RANDALL Cathleen Coyle | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 91 | CHEN Yuhan (Daisy) | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 92 | TODD Phoebe | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 93 | ZHOU Ruoxi ( Jasmine) | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 94 | WUNNAVA Ellora | 52% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.