Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | BRATTON Jack S. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 2 | XIAO Ethan J. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 3 | ROMANOV Michael | V V V D V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 3 | LI Simon A. | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 5 | RITCHIE Luke W. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 6 | COLON Cesar L. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 7 | CANNON Caiden | V V D V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 8 | PITCHER Skylar L. | V V D D V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 9 | BARLETTA Joseph | V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 10 | HAY Gavin | V V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 11 | PETREE Justin | D V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 12 | O'BRIEN Jack K. | D V V V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 13 | XIAO Enoch A. | V V D V D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 14 | HAINES Ethan | D D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 15 | JACOBS Tyler M. | V D D V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 16 | SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. | V D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 17 | BOLTON Lucas R. | V V V V D | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 18 | RYAN Connor Q. | V V D D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 19 | FREEMAN Paris | D D V V V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 20 | HARDMAN III Harry C. | D D V V V | D | 0.8 | 3 | +2.2 |
| 21 | ZHAO Jason L. | D D V V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 22 | WATERS Will T. | D D V V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 22 | ANDERSON David C. | D V V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 24 | GUTIERREZ Jose J. | V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 25 | RINEHART Conner M. | V D D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 26 | TAYLOR Nolan J. | D D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 27 | SZELA Tom J. | D V D D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 28 | WHITE-ROY Nolan | D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 29 | RYAN Ben | V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 30 | OBERYSZYN Evan | D D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 31 | JUSCINSKI Michal | D D D D | V D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 32 | UPTON Craig | D D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 33 | SCHECHTER Nathan L. | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 33 | BLACKLEDGE Michael | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 35 | BOLD Timothy | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.